Home Your basket
• Diagnostic value of fine-...
   Price 8.50 €
• A schwannoma of the hypog...
   Price 8.50 €
• Results of alginate and h...
   Price 10.50 €
• Side-to-end hypoglossal-f...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cervical approach to a li...
   Price 8.00 €
• Facial nerve outcome af...
   Price 12.50 €
• The cost of running a mul...
   Price 5.50 €
• The three-stage frontal f...
   Price 14.00 €
• Evaluation of rhinologic ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Air rifle pellet injury t...
   Price 5.50 €
• Migraine, neurone and ves...
   Price 5.50 €
• Vascular tumors of the n...
   Price 10.50 €
• Evaluation and treatment ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Peptide receptor radionuc...
   Price 14.00 €
• Cellular, extracellular a...
   Price 10.50 €
• Conference : Medicine of ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Notes on voice and speech...
   Price 8.50 €
• Endoscopic anatomy of the...
   Price 10.50 €
• Hearing aid : practical a...
   Price 8.50 €
• Surgical anatomy of the n...
   Price 10.50 €
• Auditory screening in neo...
   Price 8.50 €
• Experimental study on sim...
   Price 10.50 €
• Diagnosis of non organic ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Rhinoplasty: Advantages a...
   Price 10.50 €
• A comparative study of br...
   Price 10.50 €
• Nasopharyngeal tuberculos...
   Price 5.50 €
• Face and neck lift using ...
   Price 14.00 €
• Adenocarcinoma of the end...
   Price 8.50 €
• Nasal cutaneous cryptococ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Pleomorphic adenoma of th...
   Price 12.00 €
• Central auditory processi...
   Price 10.50 €

Total Order 291.00 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 5 - 2004 o

PHONIATRICS

Voice handicap evaluation after supracricoid partial laryngectomy.


Authors : M. Makeieff, F. Venail, R. Garrel, B. Amy de la Bretèque, A. Giovanni, B. Guerrier (Montpellier)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2004;125,5:313-317.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : The importance of patient self-impressions has been emphasized in determining the success of cancer treatment. The supracricoid partial laryngectomy (SCPL) is recognized as a suitable procedure for the treatment of T1b and T2 glottic carcinoma. The aim of this surgical procedure is the preservation of a physiologic phonation with optimal oncologic control. Method: Measurements included Voice handicap Index (VHI), Voice Related Quality of Life (VRQL), subjective (GRBAS) and objective analysis. Objectives: evaluate voice problems after SCPL, provide correlations between patients’ daily activities, VHI, and subjective evaluation of the dysphonia. Patients: 53 patients were assessed more than 1 year after SCPL. 26 patients, less than 60 years of age and professionally active were included. The mean age was 48 years (43 to 59 years). Eleven patients had professional activities in the communications industry requiring a compulsory daily use of their voices. Results: 57.6% of the active patients underwent a cessation or an adaptation of their professional activities. The mean VHI was 52.22. It was respectively 36.3, 50.03 and 52.42 according to the grade 1, 2, 3 of dysphonia. Correlations between VHI and the time laps since intervention (p: 0.047), discontinuation of professional activities (p: 0.037), and grade of dysphonia (p: 0.049) were found. Conclusion: VHI allows an evaluation of the voice problems after SCPL. A significant impact on voice is reported after SCPL and may influence the patient’s life, with potential disturbance of their professional activities. Potential post surgical voice impact must be considered when the therapeutic options are discussed.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE