Home Your basket
• Mucoepidermoid carcinomas...
   Price 10.50 €
• Herniation of the temporo...
   Price 12.50 €
• Hearing aid : practical a...
   Price 8.50 €
• A survey of current wound...
   Price 5.50 €
• New technique of myringop...
   Price 5.50 €
• Schwannomas of the neck. ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Proposal of a rating scal...
   Price 10.50 €
• Difficult blepharoplastie...
   Price 10.50 €
• Eagle’s syndrome: A case ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Multiple intracranial epi...
   Price 14.00 €
• Nasal cutaneous cryptococ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Evolution of facial nerve...
   Price 10.50 €
• XVIth World Congress of O...
   Price 8.50 €
• Are we sectioning the coc...
   Price 10.50 €
• Exploration of the otolit...
   Price 10.50 €
• Pharyngeal pouch surgery ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Pleomorphic adenoma of th...
   Price 8.50 €
• Utility of positron emiss...
   Price 8.50 €
• Bilateral vestibular loss...
   Price 10.50 €
• Otologic surgery in HIV-i...
   Price 8.50 €
• Dehiscence of the superio...
   Price 10.50 €
• Metastatic angiosarcoma t...
   Price 5.50 €
• Transoral surgical treatm...
   Price 8.50 €
• Surgery of mucocele of th...
   Price 10.50 €
• Post-operative complicati...
   Price 10.50 €
• Adenoid cystic carcinoma ...
   Price 5.50 €
• The tensegrity concept ap...
   Price 10.50 €
• Comparison of stapes prot...
   Price 15.00 €
• Notes on voice and speech...
   Price 8.50 €
• Dysphonia in children: Re...
   Price 12.50 €
• The lymphoepithelial carc...
   Price 5.50 €
• Aging and life quality: A...
   Price 12.50 €
• Efficacy and safety of mo...
   Price 10.50 €
• The ultra-rapid cinematog...
   Price 10.50 €
• Aberrant internal carotid...
   Price 5.50 €

Total Order 322.50 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 1 - 2004 o

AUDIOLOGY

The effect of the speaker gender on speech intelligibility in normal-hearing subjects with simulated high frequency hearing loss


Authors : M. A. Kiliç, F. Ögüt (Izmir)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2004;125,1:35-38.

Article published in english
Downloadable PDF document english



Summary : Objective: to determine whether speaker gender affects speech discrimination scores, in normal hearing and simulated high frequency hearing loss situations. Materials and Methods: listeners were twenty normal volunteers. The speech stimuli were eight phonetically balanced monosyllabic word lists, uttered by a male and a female speakers. These lists were low-pass filtered at 1500, 2500 and 3500 Hz’s to represent high frequency hearing loss. To obtain speech discrimination scores, the subjects listened to each of the eight lists in a different filtering and talker conditions in a randomized order. For statistical analysis, Mann-Whitney U test was used. Results: in normal hearing situation, the scores obtained by male and female speeches, were similar (p=0.60). On the contrary, statistically significant differences were observed in all of the three high frequency hearing loss situations (p<0.01). Conclusion: Female speech is significantly more difficult to discriminate than male speech in normal-hearing subjects with simulated high frequency hearing loss and probably in patients with high frequency hearing loss.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE