Home Your basket
• Reconstruction of the ant...
   Price 8.50 €
• Adenoid cystic carcinoma ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Proposal of a rating scal...
   Price 10.50 €
• Comparison between extern...
   Price 10.50 €
• Bronchoscopic findings in...
   Price 10.50 €
• The outcome of treatments...
   Price 10.50 €
• Subdural empyema complica...
   Price 5.50 €
• Myofibroma of the mandibu...
   Price 8.50 €
• Allergic rhinitis...
   Price 8.50 €
• Epidemiology of paediatri...
   Price 10.50 €
• Treatment by enlargement ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Antro choanal polyp in ch...
   Price 10.00 €
• Otosclerosis among patien...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cervical cystic lymphangi...
   Price 5.50 €
• Speech intelligibility in...
   Price 10.50 €
• Research in cancer : adva...
   Price 5.50 €
• Tuberculous acute mastoid...
   Price 5.50 €
• Metastatic angiosarcoma t...
   Price 5.50 €
• Hearing aid : practical a...
   Price 8.50 €
• Defects in accuracy of th...
   Price 10.50 €
• The “Deglutition Handicap...
   Price 10.50 €
• Social consequence of a d...
   Price 10.50 €
• Laryngeal pemphigus...
   Price 5.50 €
• Granular cell tumours (Ab...
   Price 8.50 €
• Aesthetic parotidectomy: ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Is it possible to evolve ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Aesthetic profiloplasty: ...
   Price 10.50 €
• One-stage surgery of midd...
   Price 8.50 €
• Functional septal surgery...
   Price 10.50 €
• Esthesioneuroblastoma....
   Price 5.50 €
• A study of peristomal rec...
   Price 5.50 €

Total Order 264.00 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 1 - 2011 o

PHONIATRICS

Context influence on the perception of dysphonia: when the knowledge of the patient’s clinical state can modify the results of perceptual voice quality assess­ment


Authors : Ghio A, Merienne S, Giovanni A. (Marseille)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2011;132,1:9-17.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Two experiments were conducted to examine how knowledge of the patient’s clinical state affects the results of perceptual voice quality assessment performed by specialists in voice therapy. This study involved 53 patients with a dysphonia. For each speaker, we selected a pair of recordings made in different circumstances. These pairs of voices were presented to seven listeners (ENT surgeons or speech therapists). The task was to perceptually compare the severity of the dysphonia between the 2 recordings of the pair. Stimuli were presented first in a blind test, then several weeks later with accompanying information about the patient; in particular, whether the voice was pre- or post- treatment was explicitly specified. We balanced this artificial contextual information in order to (α) reinforce the blind judgment (for example, voices perceived as better in the blind test were indicated as post treatment); (β) be inconsistent (in a clinical point of view) compared to the blind test (for example, voices perceived as more disordered during the blind test were indicated as post treatment). Results revealed that in the clinical-consistent context α, the preference was amplified in a significant way. In clinical-inconsistent condition β, we observed an inhibition effect or a change of decision. In this condi­tion, the judgment was more dependant on the contextual information (pre/post treatment) than on the auditory sensation obtained in blind condition. These findings are discussed with reference to results in the literature on visual, olfactory or audi­tory perception in context. In the frame of perceptual voice assess­ment, results revealed that only blind tests can provide reliable results.


Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE