Home Your basket
• Anosmia following superio...
   Price 5.50 €
• The uses of computer-assi...
   Price 10.50 €
• Bilateral cochlear implan...
   Price 5.50 €
• Transsexualism: From diag...
   Price 10.50 €
• Metastatic angiosarcoma t...
   Price 5.50 €
• A rare tumor of the parap...
   Price 5.50 €
• Prosodic features of comp...
   Price 10.50 €
• Virtual audiovisual talki...
   Price 10.50 €
• Hearing aids rehabilitati...
   Price 12.50 €
• Cervical cystic lymphangi...
   Price 5.50 €
• The monaural pseudo-stere...
   Price 8.50 €
• Hyperglycemia after intra...
   Price 8.50 €
• Pulsatile tinnitus and ve...
   Price 8.50 €
• Prevalence of sensineural...
   Price 14.00 €
• Communication disorders m...
   Price 5.50 €
• Orbital apex syndrome fol...
   Price 10.50 €
• Alternative clinical mana...
   Price 10.50 €
• Monolingualism, an overlo...
   Price 5.50 €
• Subdural empyema complica...
   Price 5.50 €
• Clinical and histopatholo...
   Price 10.50 €
• Are we sectioning the coc...
   Price 10.50 €
• Bullet in the pharynx: En...
   Price 10.50 €
• Voice after supracricoid ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Endoscopic endonasal surg...
   Price 8.50 €
• Intrapetrous cholesteatom...
   Price 10.50 €
• Herniation of the temporo...
   Price 12.50 €
• Notes on voice and speech...
   Price 8.50 €
• Newborn and infant nasal ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Lysis of the incus long p...
   Price 10.50 €
• A survey of current wound...
   Price 5.50 €
• New technique of myringop...
   Price 5.50 €
• Benign tumors of the nasa...
   Price 14.00 €
• The effectiveness of voic...
   Price 14.00 €

Total Order 296.00 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 1 - 2009 o

DYSPHAGIA

Study of the predictive value of detection tests for silent aspirations


Authors : Woisard V, Réhault E, Brouard C, Fichaux-Bourin P, Puech M, Grand S. (Toulouse)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2009;130,1:53-60.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Screening for aspiration in patients with swallowing disorders is important in preventing complications. The tests used in this regard are insufficient due to silent aspiration relating to abnormal protective reflexes in many patients with swallowing problems. Objective: The aim of this study is to determine the predictive values of simple tests in screening for silent aspiration. Material and method: The reference test used was videofluoroscopic examination on swallowing. In the presence of aspiration (FR+) the presence (ME+) or not (ME-) of a cough of throat clearing was noted. The tests being studied were a nasal test with isotonic saline and swallowing according to a set time. Results: For screening for aspiration the presence of a “wet voice” was considered to be a sign of reduced protective reflexes. 1) During the nasal test, the results are 100% for the positive predictive value (VPp) and 83.3% for the negative predictive value (VPn); 2) These results are respectively 84.6% and 35.9% during the swallowing test. Regarding screening for silent aspiration, 1) during the nasal test, the results are 62.5% for the positive predictive value (VPp) and 36.3% for the negative predictive value (VPn); 2) These results are respectively 54.5% and 26.6% during the swallowing test. Conclusion: This preliminary study points out the lack of predictive value of the nasal test and the swallow test for the silent aspirations. However the results could be useful for other researchers developping other tests in this area.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE