Home Your basket
• Prognostic value of mandi...
   Price 10.50 €
• Lengthening temporalis my...
   Price 10.50 €
• Voice after supracricoid ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Evaluation of the efficie...
   Price 10.50 €
• Submental flap for auricu...
   Price 8.50 €
• Guidelines for the clinic...
   Price 12.50 €
• Side effects and patients...
   Price 10.50 €
• Nasal polyposis and olfac...
   Price 10.50 €
• Vocal rehabilitation with...
   Price 10.50 €
• Contribution of endoscopi...
   Price 8.50 €
• Lateral semicircular cana...
   Price 10.50 €
• Construction and validati...
   Price 10.50 €
• Alternative clinical mana...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cosmetic radiofrequency...
   Price 10.50 €
• Adenocarcinoma of the end...
   Price 8.50 €
• Occupational therapy in t...
   Price 8.50 €
• Evaluation of vocal abuse...
   Price 8.50 €
• Parry-Romberg syndrome as...
   Price 12.50 €
• The value of fine-needle ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Acoustic study of sustain...
   Price 10.50 €
• Functional results of vel...
   Price 5.50 €
• Middle ear osteoma: A rar...
   Price 8.50 €
• Adenoid cystic carcinoma ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Schwannomas of the neck. ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Hearing aid : practical a...
   Price 8.50 €
• Recurrent ameloblastoma o...
   Price 8.50 €
• Endoscopic endonasal surg...
   Price 8.50 €
• Cochlear implantation in ...
   Price 14.00 €
• Schwannoma of the postcri...
   Price 5.50 €
• Functional comparison of ...
   Price 14.00 €
• Today’s importance of ult...
   Price 14.00 €
• Use of inomeric cement: P...
   Price 10.50 €
• Botulinum toxin in the lo...
   Price 14.00 €

Total Order 331.50 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 3 - 2014 o

CANCER

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in head and neck melano­ma: A single institution analysis


Authors : Penicaud M, Cammilleri S, Giorgi R, Grob JJ, Taïeb D, Giovanni A, Dessi P, Fakhry N. (Marseille)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2014;135,3:115-120.

Article published in english
Downloadable PDF document english



Summary : Introduction: The aim of our study was to analyze a series of patients from our institution who underwent surgery for head and neck cutaneous melanoma and who received sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). Material and methods: A single-center observational cohort of 120 head and neck melanoma patients was investigated from 2002 to 2011. Results: Among the 107 patients (89.2%) with lymph node identified during lympho­scinti­graphy, at least one node was collected and analyzed in 96 patients (90.6%). A positive sentinel lymph node was found in 9.4% of patients. Our data showed higher failure rate of lymphoscintigraphic identification (11.7%), lower rate of SLN posi­ti­vity (9.4%), and higher false-negative rate of SLNB (24.1%) than the usual figures established for malignant mela­no­mas in other locations. After a mean follow-up of 38.1 months, the disease-free survival (DFS) rate in the positive SLN group was 53% vs 75% for the negative SLN after 2 years of follow-up and 53% vs 48% after 5 years (p= 0.44). Con­clu­sion: The comple­xity of lymphatic drainage and the ana­tomy of the cervical region probably accounts for a speci­fi­ci­ties which result in a lower predictive value of SLNB in head and neck melanoma than in MM in other locations.

Price : 15.00 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE