Home Your basket
• Management of a huge amel...
   Price 5.50 €
• Nasal cutaneous cryptococ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Notes on voice and speech...
   Price 8.50 €
• Contribution of endoscopi...
   Price 8.50 €
• Cochlear implants in chil...
   Price 10.50 €
• Laryngeal paraganglioma m...
   Price 8.50 €
• Pulsatile tinnitus and ve...
   Price 8.50 €
• Metastatic angiosarcoma t...
   Price 5.50 €
• Evaluation and treatment ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Hearing aid : practical a...
   Price 8.50 €
• Modified butterfly cartil...
   Price 10.50 €
• A survey of current wound...
   Price 5.50 €
• Choanal atresia: therapeu...
   Price 10.50 €
• What we don’t know about ...
   Price 12.50 €
• "Bamboo nodes" : a clinic...
   Price 8.50 €
• Combined transoral and su...
   Price 10.50 €
• Microdebrider-assisted pa...
   Price 10.50 €
• Post intubation collected...
   Price 8.50 €
• Interventional phoniatry...
   Price 14.00 €
• Otolaryngological aspects...
   Price 8.50 €
• Pharyngolaryngectomy for ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Benign positional vertigo...
   Price 8.50 €
• Tuberculous acute mastoid...
   Price 5.50 €
• Traditional and emerging ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Acoustic neuroma surgery....
   Price 10.50 €
• Iatrogenic scarring of th...
   Price 12.00 €
• Interest of hypnotherapy ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Balance disorders in the ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Descriptive anatomy of th...
   Price 10.50 €
• Multiple intracranial epi...
   Price 14.00 €
• Surgical procedure in fir...
   Price 8.50 €
• The importance of the sta...
   Price 5.50 €

Total Order 292.50 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 4 - 2006 o

OTONEUROLOGY

The neurotologic evaluation of vestibular schwannomas. Results of audiological and vestibular testing in 100 consecutive cases.


Authors : B. K. Diallo, V. Franco-Vidal, D. Vasili, M. Négrevergne, P. Darrouzet, R. Diouf, V. Darrouzet (Bordeaux)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2006;127,4:203-209.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Objectives: To determine the results and sensitivity of a comprehensive audiological and vestibular work-up in patients presenting with vestibular schwannoma (VS). Material and Methods: One hundred consecutive cases of VS diagnosed from January 2004 to May 2005 were prospectively studied. The tumour size was classified according to Koos classification and hearing was assessed according to the five-stage classification from the Tokyo consensus. A comprehensive work-up was conducted in all patients, including pure tone and speech audiometry, Brainstem Evoked Audiologic Potentials (BEAP) assessment, Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials (VEMP) examination and bithermal caloric testing using videonystagmography, on both sides. BEAP responses were considered as normal or endocochlear when interwave intervals were normal, absent because of poor hearing or retrocochlear when wave 1 to 5 interval > 4.3 ms and/or when this interval was greater than > 0.25 ms between sides, or when no response was recorded when hearing was preserved. VEMP were considered as normal absent or diminished (amplitude < 50%, as compared with contralateral). Caloric responses were considered normal, reduced (reduced by ? 30%) absent (reduced by > 80%). Results: Fifty-six women and 44 men were examined (mean age 57.8 years). Left and right side were equally affected. Vertigo, tinnitus and hearing loss were the main presenting symptom in 21%, 32% and 68% of the cases, respectively. Eighty-two per cent were operated, 17% simply monitored and 1% irradiated. The tumours were Stage 1, 2, 3 and 4 in 14%, 28%, 21% and 37%, respectively. Hearing was class A in 9%, Class B in 34%, Class C in 14% and Class E-D in 43% of the cases. Globally, BEAP showed a retrocochlear pattern in 64% of the cases and no response in 30%. Abnormal responses of VEMP were observed in 94% of the cases. Caloric testing was abnormal in 61% and normal in 11%. Responses could not be analyzed in 28% of patients. Only one patient showed normal responses to the whole work-up (99% sensitivity). This patient had a small intrameatal tumour and actually complained of contralateral symptoms. Conclusion: The results suggest that a full audiovestibular assessment can help diagnose VS of all sizes. But false-negative results remain possible in small intrameatal tumours (1%). In addition it can give useful postoperative prognostic information.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE