Home Your basket
• Notes on voice and speech...
   Price 8.50 €
• Postural control accordin...
   Price 10.50 €
• High click stimulus repet...
   Price 10.50 €
• Is coincidence detection ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Amphicrine adenoma of the...
   Price 8.50 €
• Defects in accuracy of th...
   Price 10.50 €
• Migrating hypopharyngeal ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Decompression surgery for...
   Price 8.50 €
• Formant structures of vow...
   Price 10.50 €
• The EXIT procedure: Princ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Papillary carcinoma arisi...
   Price 5.50 €
• Endoscopic endonasal surg...
   Price 8.50 €
• Voice rehabilitation afte...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cephalic vein access for ...
   Price 10.50 €
• A new tongue plate for us...
   Price 5.50 €
• Metastatic angiosarcoma t...
   Price 5.50 €
• Phonatory threshold press...
   Price 10.50 €
• ENT localisation of amylo...
   Price 15.00 €
• Efficacy of voice therapy...
   Price 10.50 €
• Nasal cutaneous cryptococ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Different methods in iden...
   Price 14.00 €
• Microsurgical reconstruct...
   Price 10.50 €
• Disorders of the sense of...
   Price 5.50 €
• Nasal polyposis and olfac...
   Price 10.50 €
• Recurrences of pleomorphi...
   Price 10.50 €
• Transoral surgical treatm...
   Price 8.50 €
• Otomycosis due to Scopula...
   Price 10.50 €
• Inflammatory pathology an...
   Price 10.50 €
• Results of fine needle as...
   Price 10.50 €
• Relation between actinomy...
   Price 10.50 €
• Acoustic recognition of e...
   Price 8.50 €
• Atelectasis of the maxill...
   Price 8.50 €
• Peptide receptor radionuc...
   Price 14.00 €
• Vestibular dysfunction af...
   Price 10.50 €
• The value of the operatin...
   Price 10.50 €
• Speech intelligibility in...
   Price 10.50 €
• The Voice Handicap Index:...
   Price 10.50 €
• The sound intensity after...
   Price 10.50 €
• Interest of the cervical ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Utility of positron emiss...
   Price 8.50 €
• Complicated fungal sinusi...
   Price 8.50 €
• The lymphoepithelial carc...
   Price 5.50 €
• Correlation between laryn...
   Price 10.50 €
• Assessing efficacy of voi...
   Price 5.50 €
• Reconstruction of a trans...
   Price 8.50 €
• The tensegrity concept ap...
   Price 10.50 €
• Acute mesenteric ischemia...
   Price 5.50 €
• "Sonorous man" - an appro...
   Price 8.50 €
• Follow up of tracheostoma...
   Price 12.00 €
• Multiple intracranial epi...
   Price 14.00 €
• Prosodic analysis of spee...
   Price 10.50 €
• A case of nasal foreign b...
   Price 8.50 €
• Quality of life evaluatio...
   Price 10.50 €
• Deafness in adults. Study...
   Price 10.50 €
• Skull vibratory test in p...
   Price 10.50 €
• A study of consonant inte...
   Price 10.50 €
• Sinonasal malignant melan...
   Price 5.50 €
• Actinomycosis of the midd...
   Price 5.50 €
• Endoscopic resection of s...
   Price 10.50 €
• The input of autogenous g...
   Price 10.50 €
• Implementation of the Eur...
   Price 10.50 €
• Side effects and patients...
   Price 10.50 €
• Chyle leak after cervical...
   Price 15.00 €
• Overlay versus underlay t...
   Price 10.50 €
• Hearing aid : practical a...
   Price 8.50 €
• Diagnostic value of fine-...
   Price 8.50 €
• Cerebro-spinal fluid otor...
   Price 5.50 €
• Cosmetic radiofrequency...
   Price 10.50 €
• Electrorhinomanometric ev...
   Price 10.50 €
• Partial allotransplantati...
   Price 10.50 €
• Understanding the use of ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Vertigo: progress and pra...
   Price 8.50 €
• BAHA in single sided deaf...
   Price 12.50 €

Total Order 697.50 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 1 - 2007 o

OTOLOGY

Comparative study using AAO-HNS guidelines for conductive hearing loss and Glasgow Benefit Plot to evaluate results of stapes surgery for otosclerosis: Results of 129 cases


Authors : Caces F, Braccini F. (Villefranche)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2007;128,1:47-53.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Aim of the study: For surgery of otosclerosis, broughting to the fore interest of crossing informations achieved by using AAO-HNS guidelines for conductive hearing loss and Glasgow Benefit Plot (GBP). Secondary aim: compare stapedotomy with and without veinous interposition. Institutions: Referential otologic center in semi-country-side general hospital and private institution in urban zone. Materials and method: retrospective bi-centric study comparing 129 cases of primary surgery for otosclerosis between 1998 and 2004. 3 groups: stapedotomy without veinous interposition (92 cases), stapedotomy with veinous interposition (27 cases), stapedectomy (10 cases). Results given following AAO-HNS guidelines and GBP. Statistical analysis used: variance analysis test and t-Student test (p ? 0,05), graphic analysis of inter-aural difference before and after surgery. Results: Main benefit in air conduction (AC) threshold is 23 to 25 dB, no statistical difference between both techniques of stapedotomy. Stapedotomy gives better results than stapedectomy in this serie. Stereophony is achieved in 75% of overall cases with stapedotomy but normal hearing is achieved in only 53% of unilateral pre operative hearing loss. Comments: Stapedotomy is a more effective technique in this serie. Crossing informations achieved using AAO-HNS guidelines and GBP leads to give a more realistic and comprehensive understanding to patients who will undergo surgery for otosclerosis.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE