Home Your basket
• Nasal cutaneous cryptococ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Study on the modeling of ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Botulinum toxin and rejuv...
   Price 10.50 €
• Vocal effectiveness in sp...
   Price 10.50 €
• One-stage surgery of midd...
   Price 8.50 €
• Interest of hypnotherapy ...
   Price 10.50 €
• The clinical significance...
   Price 5.50 €
• Stingy speakers....
   Price 5.50 €
• Blepharoplasty and upper ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Parapharyngeal tumours: M...
   Price 10.50 €
• MIF in Head and Neck canc...
   Price 10.50 €
• Polymorphisms of the huma...
   Price 10.50 €
• Clinical signs and correl...
   Price 10.50 €
• Central auditory processi...
   Price 10.50 €
• Evaluation of a dysphonic...
   Price 10.50 €
• The Bell Labs contributio...
   Price 12.50 €
• Acoustic neuroma surgery....
   Price 10.50 €
• Bilateral and recurrent f...
   Price 5.50 €
• Assessment of migraine re...
   Price 8.50 €
• Esthesioneuroblastoma....
   Price 5.50 €
• Correlation between the r...
   Price 12.50 €
• Determination of oesophag...
   Price 10.50 €
• Metastatic angiosarcoma t...
   Price 5.50 €
• F0 characteristics in Par...
   Price 12.00 €
• Benign positional vertigo...
   Price 8.50 €
• Modern lipostructure: The...
   Price 10.50 €
• How to take a mastoid and...
   Price 8.50 €
• Bilateral abductor vocal ...
   Price 14.00 €
• Does indermil glue improv...
   Price 5.50 €
• Transsexuality: Speech th...
   Price 10.50 €
• Free novascularized bone ...
   Price 15.00 €
• Prosodic analysis of spee...
   Price 10.50 €
• Clinical implementation o...
   Price 5.50 €
• Changing patterns of bucc...
   Price 10.50 €
• Vocalab: A new software f...
   Price 8.50 €
• Sinonasal malignant melan...
   Price 5.50 €
• Recurrences of pleomorphi...
   Price 10.50 €

Total Order 347.00 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 5 - 2001 o

AUDIOLOGY

The monaural pseudo-stereophonic hearing aid (BAHA) in unilateral total deafness : a study of 29 patients


Authors : F. M. Vaneecloo, I. Ruzza, J. N. Hanson, T. Gérard, J. Dehaussy, M. Cory, C. Arrouet, C. Vincent (Lille)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2001;122,5:343-350.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : For many years, unilateral total deafness has been considered a minor handicap which does not require the fitting of a hearing aid. If the condition did give a major problem, the usual recommendation for this type of hearing loss was a CROS system which, in addition to problems of function and aesthetics, gave poor results. Faced with increasing demands from these patients, and given the good performance of bone conduction implants (BAHA), we decided to try to implant these devices on the deaf side, which allowed, by way of transcranial conduction, stimulation of the functioning ear and the re-establishment of a certain degree of stereophonic hearing. This study of 29 patients who were tested by stereophonic audiometry pre- and post-implantation shows that this type of aiding is beneficial, with improvement of the threshold of intelligibility against background noise of between 5 and 15 dB during Hirsch's test, correction of the "dead angle" on the deaf side, and improvement in localisation of sound in space. From the functional point of view, 88 % of patients were satisfied with their aid, which they wore for 8 or 9 hours per day, and had a marked improvement in their hearing performance under various conditions which had proved very difficult for them before they were fitted with the aid. These results all demonstrate the effectiveness of the implant used in this way. The fact that sounds are received on the totally deaf side goes a long way towards establishing satisfactory hearing. True stereophonic hearing could not be established in any of the cases, because this requires input from two ears. It is for this reason that we have termed this type of aid as monaural pseudo-stereophonic.

Price : 8.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE