Home Your basket
• Experimental study on sim...
   Price 10.50 €
• F0 characteristics in Par...
   Price 12.00 €
• Cervical liposuction: A r...
   Price 10.50 €
• Interest of the chest CT ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Nasal cutaneous cryptococ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Genotype – phenotype corr...
   Price 8.50 €
• Facial threads for face l...
   Price 10.50 €
• Metastatic angiosarcoma t...
   Price 5.50 €
• A protocol for the evalua...
   Price 8.50 €
• Farber's disease: a cause...
   Price 5.50 €
• Sinonasal malignant melan...
   Price 5.50 €
• Different clinical approa...
   Price 5.50 €
• Investigations on the ton...
   Price 10.50 €
• Vibrant Soundbridge middl...
   Price 10.50 €
• Treatment of children wit...
   Price 8.50 €
• Spontaneous cholesteatoma...
   Price 8.50 €
• Migraine, neurone and ves...
   Price 5.50 €
• Esophageal foreign body: ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Cholesterol granuloma of ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Zenker's diverticulum: Te...
   Price 10.50 €
• Inverted naso-sinus papil...
   Price 10.50 €
• Middle ear osteoma: A rar...
   Price 8.50 €
• How to take a mastoid and...
   Price 8.50 €
• Nasal polyposis: long ter...
   Price 10.50 €
• Study of tongue pressure ...
   Price 12.00 €
• How to manage post staped...
   Price 5.50 €
• Interest of MIBI scintigr...
   Price 10.50 €
• Kikuchi's disease as the ...
   Price 10.50 €
• The emergency in the mana...
   Price 10.50 €
• Posterior cranial fossa a...
   Price 8.50 €
• A protocol for post-opera...
   Price 5.50 €
• Notes on voice and speech...
   Price 8.50 €
• Hearing preservation in p...
   Price 10.50 €
• Plastic surgery indicatio...
   Price 10.50 €
• Evolution of facial nerve...
   Price 10.50 €
• Pleomorphic adenoma of th...
   Price 8.50 €
• Hearing aid : practical a...
   Price 8.50 €
• A survey of current wound...
   Price 5.50 €
• Salivary gland choristoma...
   Price 5.50 €
• Scaling properties of the...
   Price 5.50 €
• Training strategies of th...
   Price 8.50 €

Total Order 349.50 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 3 - 2013 o

OTOLOGY

Lysis of the incus long process and incudostapedial rebridging ossiculoplasty: Comparative study of titanium-gold angle prosthesis Plester-type versus Martin Incudo Prosthesis Hydroxylapatite


Authors : Faye MB, Martin C, Schmerber S. (Dakar)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2013;134,3:125-130.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Objectives: We report two surgical techniques devised to restore a disrupted incudostapedial joint. Material and methods: Thirty patients underwent rebridging of distal portion of incus long process in the ENT Department of University of Grenoble and Saint-Etienne, between October 1998 and September 2002. Two types of ossicular prostheses were used: A titanium-gold angle prosthesis according to Plester Winkl Kurtz® (n= 16 patients), and a hydroxylapatite prosthesis as Martin Incudo Prosthesis (n= 14 patients). Results: The average hearing gain in short term is of 8.30 dB for the Martin-Incudo group. It is of 5.23 dB in the Winkel group. Seven and three cases of failures (Residual Rinne > 20dB) were noticed respectively in the groups Martin-Incudo and Winkel. Seven and four cases of labyrinthisation were observed respectively in the groups Martin-Incudo and Winkel. The average hearing gain in long term is 3.43 dB in the Martin-Incudo group ; and 2.85 dB among patients with Winkel Kurz® prosthesis. Average residual Rinne is higher than 20 dB in the Winkel group. The hearing gain is not statistically significant between the two groups (p > 0.05). Conclusion: The titanium partial prosthesis did not give good functional results. In the case of a limited lysis (< 2 mm) of the distal portion of incus, we use the cement or cartilage interposition. When ossicular chain cannot be preser­ved entirely, we privilege incus transposition or a titanium PORP. The Martin-Incudo prosthesis seems interesting in the event of lysis of 2 mm of the long process of incus, nevertheless engineering changes are necessary in order to make rigid the incudostapedial joint.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE