Home Your basket
• From the physiologic perf...
   Price 14.00 €
• Plastic surgery indicatio...
   Price 10.50 €
• New potentialities of the...
   Price 12.50 €
• Vestibular dysfunction af...
   Price 10.50 €
• Positioning in the oropha...
   Price 8.50 €
• Cervical lymph node metas...
   Price 8.50 €
• Role of [18]-FDG PET/CT i...
   Price 10.50 €
• Mycobacterial cervical ly...
   Price 10.50 €
• Why is allergic rhinitis ...
   Price 12.00 €
• Cerebro-spinal fluid otor...
   Price 5.50 €
• Augmentation of the abdom...
   Price 10.50 €
• Oncocytoma of the parotid...
   Price 8.50 €
• Evaluation of the use of ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Sacrifice was an art: The...
   Price 8.50 €
• Unilateral frontal sinus ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Unsteadiness and drunkenn...
   Price 10.50 €
• A post-styloid mass revea...
   Price 12.50 €
• Abscess tonsillectomy for...
   Price 10.50 €
• Value of the preservation...
   Price 14.00 €
• Vocal effectiveness in sp...
   Price 10.50 €
• Aneurysmal bone cyst of t...
   Price 5.50 €
• Outcome of surgical and a...
   Price 10.50 €
• The use of ultrasound eva...
   Price 8.50 €
• Context influence on the ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cervical and pharyngeal i...
   Price 5.50 €
• Personal experience about...
   Price 10.50 €
• Results of alginate and h...
   Price 10.50 €
• A single appointment with...
   Price 8.50 €
• Comparative study of anal...
   Price 14.00 €
• Management of cervical ce...
   Price 10.50 €
• Mucormycosis – early diag...
   Price 10.50 €
• Endobronchial lipomas and...
   Price 5.50 €
• Nasal cutaneous cryptococ...
   Price 5.50 €
• A sphenoidal mucocele wit...
   Price 8.50 €
• Notes on voice and speech...
   Price 8.50 €
• Complicated fungal sinusi...
   Price 8.50 €
• Chyle leak after cervical...
   Price 15.00 €
• Hearing aid : practical a...
   Price 8.50 €
• A survey of current wound...
   Price 5.50 €
• Tuberculous acute mastoid...
   Price 5.50 €
• Optimizing vocal efficien...
   Price 8.50 €

Total Order 390.00 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 3 - 2002 o

LARYNGOLOGY

The value of the operating video-fiberoscope in the assessment of the head and neck carcinoma.


Authors : M. Folia, V. Woisard, E. Uro-Coste, E. Serrano, J. J. Pessey (Toulouse)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2002;123,3:163-170.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Introduction: the aim of our study was to evaluate the video fiberoscope with operator canal (FOC) in the diagnosis of head and neck carcinoma compared to direct laryngoscopy (DL). Methodology: from August 2000 to May 2001, 82 patients were included in a prospective study. They were examined for pharyngolaryngeal cancer with the FOC, DL and a CAT-SCAN. The compared elements were the visualization of the different regions of the pharyngolarynx. A three dimensional description of the lesion, the presence of secondary localisations as well as the anatomo pathological results were obtained with FOC and DL. Results: although the pharyngolarynx is less well visualized in FOC than in DL (p = 0.04), no statistically significant difference was found between the two methods in terms of visual diagnosis and assessment of the extent of the lesion. The sensitivity of the biopsies made with FOC is lower than those performed with DL (66% FOC, 97% DL). Moreover, we have noted that FOC is highly reliant on the experience and ability of the surgeon. Conclusion: DL remains the most reliable technique for the exploration and diagnosis of the pharyngolarynx . If it is not possible to perform a DL or if it is not indicated (trismus, contra-indication to general anaesthesia) FOC should be considered as the examination of choice.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE