Home Your basket
• Cervical approach to a li...
   Price 8.00 €
• A study of peristomal rec...
   Price 5.50 €
• Silent Sinus Syndrome – T...
   Price 8.50 €
• Nystagmus and vibratory t...
   Price 10.50 €
• Metastatic angiosarcoma t...
   Price 5.50 €
• Develop­ment of an osteos...
   Price 8.50 €
• Results of six years expe...
   Price 8.50 €
• Lengthening temporalis my...
   Price 10.50 €
• Post operative Caldwell-L...
   Price 10.00 €
• Unsteadiness and drunkenn...
   Price 10.50 €
• Mucus physiopathology, up...
   Price 12.50 €
• Partial allotransplantati...
   Price 10.50 €
• Autologous bone pate in m...
   Price 10.50 €
• Treating vertigo with ves...
   Price 10.50 €
• Reconstruction after hemi...
   Price 14.00 €
• Laryngeal schwannoma: A c...
   Price 5.50 €
• Petrosal presigmoid appro...
   Price 8.50 €
• Peptide receptor radionuc...
   Price 14.00 €
• The Bell Labs contributio...
   Price 12.50 €
• Acceptability of topical ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Cervical spondylodiskitis...
   Price 5.50 €
• An unusual case of intrat...
   Price 5.50 €
• Ambulatory stapedectomy: ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Primary nasal tuberculosi...
   Price 5.50 €
• Osteoblastoma of the eth...
   Price 10.50 €
• Revascularized free scapu...
   Price 10.50 €
• Benign paroxysmal positio...
   Price 5.50 €
• Evaluation of the primary...
   Price 5.50 €
• Hearing aid : practical a...
   Price 8.50 €
• Principes underlying the ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Aesthetic profiloplasty: ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Psychosocial quality of l...
   Price 10.50 €
• Soft palate ventilation: ...
   Price 14.00 €
• Cholesteatoma behind a no...
   Price 10.50 €
• Results of fine needle as...
   Price 10.50 €
• When to suspect a perilym...
   Price 10.50 €
• From intelligibility to c...
   Price 10.50 €

Total Order 343.00 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 5 - 2002 o

PHONIATRICS

A study of consonant intelligibility in the French language after supra-cricoid partial laryngetomy.


Authors : L. Crevier-Buchman, J. Vaissière, S. Maeda, D. Brasnu (Paris)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2002;123,5:307-310.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Introduction: the purpose of this study was to determine what patterns of perceptual confusions characterize the voice of patients after supracricoïd partial laryngectomy (SCPL) by the identification tests of French consonants. We evaluated the voicing distinction. Methods: ten male patients were recorded 18 months after SCPL. Audio recordings of the 16 French consonants in a syllabic context (CV) produced by each talker with three repetitions were presented to three expert listeners. The listeners transcribed their responses using an open-response paradigm. Listeners' pooled responses were converted to confusion matrices. Results: voicing features were altered with a shift of voiced consonants towards voiceless consonants (24 %), predominantly for stop consonants. Conclusion: consonant articulation appears to impose certain constraints on voicing ability of SCPL patients, since voiced consonants are predominantly perceived as voiceless consonants. Presumably, this poor voicing ability is the direct consequence of the mechanical properties of the neoglottis that are far different from those of the vocal folds. Moreover, assessing consonant identification and intelligibility should help to improve voice therapy and efficiency of speech.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE