Home Your basket
• Unusual location of pleom...
   Price 12.50 €
• Does indermil glue improv...
   Price 5.50 €
• Clinical signs and correl...
   Price 10.50 €
• Orbital apex syndrome fol...
   Price 10.50 €
• Notes on voice and speech...
   Price 8.50 €
• A survey of current wound...
   Price 5.50 €
• Vertical extended hemi cr...
   Price 5.50 €
• The monaural pseudo-stere...
   Price 8.50 €
• Validation of a self-asse...
   Price 10.50 €
• Congenital bilateral choa...
   Price 5.50 €
• Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of...
   Price 5.50 €
• The place of speech thera...
   Price 8.50 €
• Presentation of a prototy...
   Price 10.50 €
• Total pharyngolayngectomy...
   Price 10.50 €
• Rhinophyma in a black afr...
   Price 5.50 €
• Decompression surgery for...
   Price 8.50 €
• Thyroid surgery (356 case...
   Price 10.50 €
• Central auditory processi...
   Price 10.50 €
• Post-traumatic otoscleros...
   Price 8.50 €
• Quality of life after oro...
   Price 10.50 €
• F0 characteristics in Par...
   Price 12.00 €
• Kikuchi Fujimoto, one cas...
   Price 10.50 €
• Mast cells in chronic inf...
   Price 10.50 €
• How to take a mastoid and...
   Price 8.50 €
• Anatomy of the external a...
   Price 14.00 €
• Is HIV/AIDS an independen...
   Price 10.50 €
• Static management of lago...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cosmetic radiofrequency...
   Price 10.50 €
• Oropharyngeal reconstruct...
   Price 10.50 €
• Revision ossiculoplasty: ...
   Price 10.50 €

Total Order 280.00 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 1 - 2011 o

PHONIATRICS

Context influence on the perception of dysphonia: when the knowledge of the patient’s clinical state can modify the results of perceptual voice quality assess­ment


Authors : Ghio A, Merienne S, Giovanni A. (Marseille)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2011;132,1:9-17.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Two experiments were conducted to examine how knowledge of the patient’s clinical state affects the results of perceptual voice quality assessment performed by specialists in voice therapy. This study involved 53 patients with a dysphonia. For each speaker, we selected a pair of recordings made in different circumstances. These pairs of voices were presented to seven listeners (ENT surgeons or speech therapists). The task was to perceptually compare the severity of the dysphonia between the 2 recordings of the pair. Stimuli were presented first in a blind test, then several weeks later with accompanying information about the patient; in particular, whether the voice was pre- or post- treatment was explicitly specified. We balanced this artificial contextual information in order to (α) reinforce the blind judgment (for example, voices perceived as better in the blind test were indicated as post treatment); (β) be inconsistent (in a clinical point of view) compared to the blind test (for example, voices perceived as more disordered during the blind test were indicated as post treatment). Results revealed that in the clinical-consistent context α, the preference was amplified in a significant way. In clinical-inconsistent condition β, we observed an inhibition effect or a change of decision. In this condi­tion, the judgment was more dependant on the contextual information (pre/post treatment) than on the auditory sensation obtained in blind condition. These findings are discussed with reference to results in the literature on visual, olfactory or audi­tory perception in context. In the frame of perceptual voice assess­ment, results revealed that only blind tests can provide reliable results.


Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE