Home Your basket
• Prosodic analysis of spee...
   Price 10.50 €
• A giant lipoma of parapha...
   Price 8.50 €
• Rejuvenation of the eye: ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Nasal cutaneous cryptococ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Lingual granuloma of preg...
   Price 5.50 €
• Interventional phoniatry...
   Price 14.00 €
• Hearing aid : practical a...
   Price 8.50 €
• Contribution to anatomica...
   Price 10.50 €
• Ossicular reconstruction ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Notes on voice and speech...
   Price 8.50 €
• Predictive factors for re...
   Price 14.00 €
• Prosody and reading: Temp...
   Price 12.00 €
• Recurrences of pleomorphi...
   Price 10.50 €
• Laryngeal schwannomas...
   Price 5.50 €
• Prosodic features of comp...
   Price 10.50 €
• Endoscopic scale for eval...
   Price 8.50 €
• Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid...
   Price 10.50 €
• Diagnosis and treatment o...
   Price 8.50 €
• The effects of treatments...
   Price 14.00 €
• Vibrant Soundbridge middl...
   Price 10.50 €
• Study of the predictive v...
   Price 10.50 €
• Study of the platysma col...
   Price 10.50 €
• Partial allotransplantati...
   Price 10.50 €
• Paraganglioma of the cere...
   Price 5.50 €
• Evolution of voice assess...
   Price 10.50 €
• Vestibular dysfunction af...
   Price 10.50 €
• Treatments of hereditary ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Comparison between extern...
   Price 10.50 €
• Correlation between the r...
   Price 12.50 €
• Laryngeal paraganglioma m...
   Price 8.50 €
• The complications of end...
   Price 8.50 €
• Myringoplasties for anter...
   Price 10.50 €
• Benign positional vertigo...
   Price 8.50 €
• The jugulotympanic paraga...
   Price 10.50 €
• Failure rate and revision...
   Price 10.50 €
• Comparison of three diffe...
   Price 12.00 €
• Treatment of children wit...
   Price 8.50 €

Total Order 366.00 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 4 - 2012 o

SALIVARY GLANDS

Mucoepidermoid carcinomas of salivary glands: Prognostic significance of immunohistochemestry. A study of 49 cases


Authors : Santini L, Coulibaly B, Gaudart J, Turner F, Michel J, Giovanni A, Dessi P, Fakhry N. (Marseille)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2012;133,4:183-187.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Introduction: Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) is consi­dered as the most common malignant salivary gland tumor. Its prognosis is dominated by the presence of high-grade forms involving life-threatening. The aim of our study was to evaluate the usefulness of immunohistochemistry to identify the most aggressive forms and allow better discrimination between low grade, intermediate grade and high grade tumors. Materials and methods: This was a retrospective study of 49 cases of mucoepidermoid carcinomas of salivary glands. Two immunohistochemical markers have mainly been studied: a marker of proliferation (Ki-67) and a growth factor receptor (EGFR). Additional analyzes were performed with other markers (p53, ACE, bcl2, CD 117 and her2). Statistical analy­sis investigated the existence of a correlation between the pre­sen­ce of these factors and the histopathological grade on one hand and survival of patients on the other hand. Results: Regarding the results of immunohistochemical Ki-67 and EGFR, it was observed a better survival rate when the immuno­staining was less than 10%. The expression of Ki-67 and EGFR was correlated with the histological grade, but did not, in our study, allow discrimination between low-grade, intermediate grade and high grade. Our results are consistent with data of the literature, including Ki-67, which appears to be a useful but not powerful marker of prognosis of MEC. Other markers studied (p53, ACE, bcl2, CD 117 and her2) showed no contri­bu­tory results. Conclusion: The prognosis of MEC is appre­ciated satisfactorily following histological criteria: histological grade, surgical margins, perineural invasion or vascular emboli. The integration of immunohistochemistry in a thera­peutic algorithm could be particularly useful for the challen­ging assessment of prognosis of intermediate grades.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE