Home Your basket
• Quality of life evaluatio...
   Price 10.50 €
• Notes on voice and speech...
   Price 8.50 €
• Endoscopic endonasal surg...
   Price 8.50 €
• Assessing efficacy of voi...
   Price 5.50 €
• Principes underlying the ...
   Price 10.50 €
• A survey of current wound...
   Price 5.50 €
• Pyogenic granuloma of the...
   Price 8.50 €
• Percutaneous gastrostomy ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Arachnoid granulations of...
   Price 10.50 €
• Artistic anatomy of the n...
   Price 8.50 €
• Facial paralysis: Functio...
   Price 10.50 €
• Vestibular neuritis: aeti...
   Price 8.50 €
• Adenocarcinoma of the eth...
   Price 8.50 €
• Nasal cutaneous cryptococ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Tonsillitis tuberculous s...
   Price 8.50 €
• The input of autogenous g...
   Price 10.50 €
• Rare benin tumors of the ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Tuberculous otomastoiditi...
   Price 5.50 €
• Interstitial brachytherap...
   Price 8.50 €
• Antro choanal polyp in ch...
   Price 10.00 €
• Meniere disease : news....
   Price 10.50 €
• Intrapetrous cholesteatom...
   Price 10.50 €
• New technique of myringop...
   Price 5.50 €
• Mast cells in chronic inf...
   Price 10.50 €
• Traditional and emerging ...
   Price 10.50 €
• The ultra-low resistance ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Esophageal foreign body: ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Massive bone dystrophic l...
   Price 5.50 €
• Augmentation of the abdom...
   Price 10.50 €
• Prognostic value of mandi...
   Price 10.50 €
• Association of thyroid he...
   Price 12.50 €
• Dysphonia and cervical hy...
   Price 5.50 €
• The pedicled musculo-cuta...
   Price 8.50 €
• Spontaneous cerebrospinal...
   Price 8.50 €
• Attention deficit disorde...
   Price 10.50 €
• Hearing aid : practical a...
   Price 8.50 €
• Vascular tumors of the n...
   Price 10.50 €
• Posterior cranial fossa a...
   Price 8.50 €
• Metastatic angiosarcoma t...
   Price 5.50 €
• Congenital cholesteatoma ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Anterior cerebrospinal fl...
   Price 10.00 €
• Cervical cystic lymphangi...
   Price 5.50 €
• Pure sensorineural hearin...
   Price 5.50 €
• Long-term results of faci...
   Price 10.50 €
• Are we sectioning the coc...
   Price 10.50 €
• Bilateral and recurrent f...
   Price 5.50 €
• Otoplasty: Special attent...
   Price 8.50 €
• Synovial sarcoma of the h...
   Price 5.50 €
• Validity of cervical ausc...
   Price 12.00 €
• Vibration induced nystagm...
   Price 10.50 €
• Proposition of adaptation...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cochlear implantation in ...
   Price 14.00 €
• Cytokines profile in cyst...
   Price 10.50 €
• Bilateral cleft lip and c...
   Price 14.00 €
• The cholesteatomatous rin...
   Price 5.50 €
• Surgical exploration of t...
   Price 10.50 €
• Audiological comparison b...
   Price 14.00 €
• Human skull development a...
   Price 10.50 €
• A comparative acoustic st...
   Price 5.50 €
• Stuttering and Tourette’s...
   Price 5.50 €
• The clinical significance...
   Price 5.50 €
• Submental flap for auricu...
   Price 8.50 €
• Papillary carcinoma arisi...
   Price 5.50 €
• When some clinical cases ...
   Price 8.50 €
• External otitis...
   Price 8.50 €
• Vibrant Soundbridge for h...
   Price 10.50 €
• Bone anchored hearing aid...
   Price 8.50 €
• Fibrous dysplasia, a case...
   Price 10.50 €
• Otologic surgery in HIV-i...
   Price 8.50 €
• Facial aesthetic lipostru...
   Price 10.50 €
• Endoscopic anatomy of the...
   Price 10.50 €
• Facial nerve monitoring d...
   Price 12.50 €
• A remnant tooth in an ede...
   Price 8.50 €
• Benign positional vertigo...
   Price 8.50 €
• Evaluation of a dysphonic...
   Price 10.50 €
• The length of the piston ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Evaluation in clinical pr...
   Price 10.50 €
• Utility of positron emiss...
   Price 8.50 €
• Abscess tonsillectomy for...
   Price 10.50 €
• Guidelines for the clinic...
   Price 12.00 €
• Prospective study on 43 s...
   Price 10.50 €

Total Order 720.00 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 1 - 2011 o

PHONIATRICS

Context influence on the perception of dysphonia: when the knowledge of the patient’s clinical state can modify the results of perceptual voice quality assess­ment


Authors : Ghio A, Merienne S, Giovanni A. (Marseille)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2011;132,1:9-17.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Two experiments were conducted to examine how knowledge of the patient’s clinical state affects the results of perceptual voice quality assessment performed by specialists in voice therapy. This study involved 53 patients with a dysphonia. For each speaker, we selected a pair of recordings made in different circumstances. These pairs of voices were presented to seven listeners (ENT surgeons or speech therapists). The task was to perceptually compare the severity of the dysphonia between the 2 recordings of the pair. Stimuli were presented first in a blind test, then several weeks later with accompanying information about the patient; in particular, whether the voice was pre- or post- treatment was explicitly specified. We balanced this artificial contextual information in order to (α) reinforce the blind judgment (for example, voices perceived as better in the blind test were indicated as post treatment); (β) be inconsistent (in a clinical point of view) compared to the blind test (for example, voices perceived as more disordered during the blind test were indicated as post treatment). Results revealed that in the clinical-consistent context α, the preference was amplified in a significant way. In clinical-inconsistent condition β, we observed an inhibition effect or a change of decision. In this condi­tion, the judgment was more dependant on the contextual information (pre/post treatment) than on the auditory sensation obtained in blind condition. These findings are discussed with reference to results in the literature on visual, olfactory or audi­tory perception in context. In the frame of perceptual voice assess­ment, results revealed that only blind tests can provide reliable results.


Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE