Home Your basket
• Validation of a self-asse...
   Price 10.50 €
• Assessing efficacy of voi...
   Price 5.50 €
• A new tongue plate for us...
   Price 5.50 €
• Cellular, extracellular a...
   Price 10.50 €
• Necrotizing external otit...
   Price 10.50 €
• Autologous bone pate in m...
   Price 10.50 €
• Microsurgical reconstruct...
   Price 10.50 €
• Voice Handicap Index adap...
   Price 10.50 €
• Fistulisation of a tuberc...
   Price 5.50 €
• The subjective visual ver...
   Price 10.50 €
• Quality of life after rad...
   Price 10.50 €
• Malignant mixed tumor of ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Distortion product otoaco...
   Price 10.50 €
• The cost of running a mul...
   Price 5.50 €
• Bilateral vestibular loss...
   Price 10.50 €
• Somatic tinnitus (review)...
   Price 12.50 €
• Implications of multiling...
   Price 12.50 €
• Voice prostheses: long-te...
   Price 10.50 €
• Evaluation of quality of ...
   Price 10.50 €
• The nasal framework in rh...
   Price 10.50 €
• Laryngeal schwannoma: A c...
   Price 8.50 €
• Lingual granuloma of preg...
   Price 5.50 €
• Osteoid osteomas in the f...
   Price 5.50 €
• Unusual location of pleom...
   Price 12.50 €
• Metastatic angiosarcoma t...
   Price 5.50 €
• Comparative results of ty...
   Price 10.50 €
• Static management of lago...
   Price 10.50 €
• Acute acoustic trauma, a ...
   Price 12.00 €
• Ruptured pexis after supr...
   Price 10.50 €
• Newborn and infant nasal ...
   Price 5.50 €
• The EXIT procedure: Princ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Prospective evaluation of...
   Price 10.50 €
• A study of consonant inte...
   Price 10.50 €
• Thyroid pseudo-nodules: 3...
   Price 5.50 €
• Is ethmoidal adenocarcino...
   Price 10.50 €
• Salvage composite resecti...
   Price 10.50 €
• Pyogenic granuloma of the...
   Price 8.50 €
• Adenoid cystic carcinoma ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Intra-orbital infected cy...
   Price 5.50 €
• Post intubation collected...
   Price 8.50 €
• Bronchoscopic findings in...
   Price 10.50 €
• Giant osteoma of the maxi...
   Price 8.50 €

Total Order 378.50 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 1 - 2012 o

PHONIATRICS

Understanding the use of self-evaluation questionnaires when assessing a patient’s swallowing capacity and performing follow-up activities


Authors : Lauret Corthay D, Garnier Paillusseau L, Borel S, Tessier C, Sauvignet A, Crevier-Buchman L. (Paris)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2012;133,1:19-26.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : The purpose of this study was to examine the possibility of improving the assessment protocol of dysphagia and show the interest of adding a self-assessment evaluation scale to the traditional functional assessment of the swallowing process. We have a comparison of the assessment of 30 dysphagic patients with two different scales (DHI and EAT-10). Results show that the self-evaluation scales selected led to quantitative data comparable to the objective results of the COLP-FR-G func­tio­nal assessment tool. We may therefore conclude that the patients’ own feelings do not differ from the results of the clini­cal dysphagia severity assessment. Results also highlight that both scales provide similar information in terms of content and also reflect the evolution of objective data. The EAT-10 scale, by its simplicity and limited number of questions, could be proposed as a screening test in neurological patients and geria­tric population, where the DHI scale, with its three sub-domains (physical, functional and emotional), would be a complementary tool for the functional swallowing evaluation. Indeed, in order to evaluate dysphagia, the association of DHI, EAT-10 and COLP-FR-G offers several advantages. This proto­col is convenient and rapid to administrate, it takes the diversity of etiologies into account and its score is easy to transmit to the patients’ medical practitioners. Consequently, its use in the assessment of swallowing functions should be encouraged as a consistent part of the clinical practice.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE