Home Your basket
• Far-advanced otosclerosis...
   Price 10.50 €
• The relevance of Choukrou...
   Price 10.50 €
• Usefulness and limitation...
   Price 10.50 €
• Correlation between laryn...
   Price 10.50 €
• Assumptions in surgical t...
   Price 8.50 €
• Surgical anatomy of the f...
   Price 10.50 €
• The nasal framework in rh...
   Price 10.50 €
• Epidermoid carcinoma of p...
   Price 10.50 €
• Therapeutic education of ...
   Price 12.50 €
• Role of [18]-FDG PET/CT i...
   Price 10.50 €
• Oto-rhino-laryngology and...
   Price 10.50 €
• Parathyroid cervical haem...
   Price 8.50 €
• Congenital bilateral choa...
   Price 5.50 €
• New trends in rhinoplasty...
   Price 10.50 €
• Hearing preservation in p...
   Price 10.50 €
• Otomycosis...
   Price 10.50 €
• Allergic and pneumologic ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Study of the predictive v...
   Price 10.50 €
• Bronchoscopic findings in...
   Price 10.50 €
• Anatomy of the external a...
   Price 14.00 €
• Acoustic analysis of the ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Advantages of combined th...
   Price 10.50 €
• Somatic tinnitus (review)...
   Price 12.50 €
• Endoscopic sphenoid proce...
   Price 8.50 €
• Setting up a «Bonebridge»...
   Price 10.50 €
• Quality of life before an...
   Price 10.50 €
• Delayed facial palsy afte...
   Price 8.50 €
• Clinical implementation o...
   Price 5.50 €
• The silent sinus syndrome...
   Price 12.50 €
• Side effects and patients...
   Price 10.50 €
• Interest of hypnotherapy ...
   Price 10.50 €

Total Order 315.00 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 1 - 2007 o

OTOLOGY

Comparative study using AAO-HNS guidelines for conductive hearing loss and Glasgow Benefit Plot to evaluate results of stapes surgery for otosclerosis: Results of 129 cases


Authors : Caces F, Braccini F. (Villefranche)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2007;128,1:47-53.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Aim of the study: For surgery of otosclerosis, broughting to the fore interest of crossing informations achieved by using AAO-HNS guidelines for conductive hearing loss and Glasgow Benefit Plot (GBP). Secondary aim: compare stapedotomy with and without veinous interposition. Institutions: Referential otologic center in semi-country-side general hospital and private institution in urban zone. Materials and method: retrospective bi-centric study comparing 129 cases of primary surgery for otosclerosis between 1998 and 2004. 3 groups: stapedotomy without veinous interposition (92 cases), stapedotomy with veinous interposition (27 cases), stapedectomy (10 cases). Results given following AAO-HNS guidelines and GBP. Statistical analysis used: variance analysis test and t-Student test (p ? 0,05), graphic analysis of inter-aural difference before and after surgery. Results: Main benefit in air conduction (AC) threshold is 23 to 25 dB, no statistical difference between both techniques of stapedotomy. Stapedotomy gives better results than stapedectomy in this serie. Stereophony is achieved in 75% of overall cases with stapedotomy but normal hearing is achieved in only 53% of unilateral pre operative hearing loss. Comments: Stapedotomy is a more effective technique in this serie. Crossing informations achieved using AAO-HNS guidelines and GBP leads to give a more realistic and comprehensive understanding to patients who will undergo surgery for otosclerosis.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE