Home Your basket
• Vertebro and cranio veino...
   Price 14.00 €
• Drop weld thermal injurie...
   Price 8.50 €
• Parapharyngeal lymph node...
   Price 8.50 €
• Lengthening temporalis my...
   Price 10.50 €
• Fistulisation of a tuberc...
   Price 5.50 €
• Therapeutic management of...
   Price 10.50 €
• Autistic like behaviour d...
   Price 8.50 €
• Transsexualism: From diag...
   Price 10.50 €
• Long-term results of faci...
   Price 10.50 €
• When some clinical cases ...
   Price 8.50 €
• A case of nasal NK/T cell...
   Price 5.50 €
• Does indermil glue improv...
   Price 5.50 €
• Vocal and behavioral adap...
   Price 10.50 €
• Quality of life before an...
   Price 10.50 €
• Combined induction chemot...
   Price 10.50 €
• A survey of current wound...
   Price 5.50 €
• Nasal septal abscess: A c...
   Price 5.50 €
• Study on the modeling of ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Adaptation and validation...
   Price 10.50 €
• Relevance of Choukroun’s ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Ethmoidal metastasis reve...
   Price 8.50 €
• Total ossicular reconstru...
   Price 10.50 €
• Inferior turbinate hypert...
   Price 10.50 €
• Pneumoparotid: a case rep...
   Price 8.50 €
• Transgender voice and com...
   Price 12.00 €
• Side effects and patients...
   Price 10.50 €
• Endoscopic medialization ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Stapedotomy and anatomica...
   Price 5.50 €
• Peritonsillar abscess: Is...
   Price 10.50 €
• Partial hearing recovery ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Arachnoid granulations of...
   Price 10.50 €
• A report of two cases of ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Plastic surgery indicatio...
   Price 10.50 €
• Is ethmoidal adenocarcino...
   Price 10.50 €
• The jugulotympanic paraga...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cerebro-spinal fluid otor...
   Price 5.50 €
• Pure sensorineural hearin...
   Price 5.50 €
• Aesthetic augmentation of...
   Price 10.50 €

Total Order 338.00 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 4 - 2002 o

AUDIOLOGY

Usefulness and limitations of speech audiometric testing in the detection of professional nose-induced hearing loss: a comparative study in two groups in the hospital setting.


Authors : E. Babin, A. Bequignon, M. Goullet de Rugy, E. Edy, S. Moreau, J. P. Izard, A. Valdazo (Caen)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2002;123,4:213-217.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Objective: the objective of this study is the evaluation of the calculation of 100% intelligibility threshold and noise resistance index as a monitoring test in populations exposed to noise in their work environment. Method: this is a retrospective exposed-unexposed study as the exposure to the risk factors took place before the survey. The exposed subjects were chosen in principle on sonometric criteria and the unexposed subjects among employees whom we believe were not exposed. The exploration method included history taking, clinical examination, free field audiometry and speech audiometry with background noise. Results: the exposed population has a 100% intelligibility threshold on average equal to 29.69 dB, significantly higher than in the unexposed population where it is calculated at 25.30 dB (p=0.07). The noise resistance index varies with age (p=0.04). Conclusion: our study shows the existence of a significant hearing difference between two populations with different noise exposure. It demonstrates a relationship between a hearing loss risk factor such as noise and the occurrence of the "professional hearing loss" disorder. The calculation of the 100% intelligibility index and the noise resistance index advantageously complements tonal audiometry. These procedures provide a better approach to the social impact of hearing loss but were not useful in the detection of hearing loss.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE