Home Your basket
• A new look on septoplasti...
   Price 10.50 €
• Notes on voice and speech...
   Price 8.50 €
• Frontal sinus osteoma and...
   Price 5.50 €
• Validation of a self asse...
   Price 10.50 €
• Isolated tracheo-œsophage...
   Price 5.50 €
• When to suspect a perilym...
   Price 10.50 €
• Electrorhinomanometric ev...
   Price 10.50 €
• A case of laryngeal sialo...
   Price 10.50 €
• Laryngeal paraganglioma m...
   Price 8.50 €
• Interest of peri-operativ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Otomycosis: Clinical and ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Mastoid eosinophilic gran...
   Price 5.50 €
• A clinico-radiological st...
   Price 10.50 €
• Nasal cutaneous cryptococ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Idiopathic sudden deafnes...
   Price 10.50 €
• Osteoid osteomas in the f...
   Price 5.50 €
• Nasal septal abscess: A c...
   Price 5.50 €
• Hearing aid : practical a...
   Price 8.50 €
• Treatment of children wit...
   Price 8.50 €
• A study of peristomal rec...
   Price 5.50 €
• Cholesteatoma and osteora...
   Price 14.00 €
• Recurrent ameloblastoma o...
   Price 8.50 €
• Microsurgical reconstruct...
   Price 10.50 €
• Thyroid tuberculosis asso...
   Price 5.50 €
• Clinical and histopatholo...
   Price 10.50 €
• Middle ear overpressure w...
   Price 10.50 €
• Prognostic value of mandi...
   Price 10.50 €
• Thyroid pseudo-nodules: 3...
   Price 5.50 €
• Treatment of head and nec...
   Price 10.50 €
• Perceptual evaluation of ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Sentinel lymph node biops...
   Price 10.50 €
• Fistula of the fourth bra...
   Price 5.50 €
• Frontal sinus osteoma com...
   Price 5.50 €
• Diagnosis and treatment o...
   Price 8.50 €
• Allergic rhinitis...
   Price 8.50 €
• Radiofrequency inferior t...
   Price 14.00 €

Total Order 311.00 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 1 - 2006 o

PLASTIC SURGERY

Rhinoplasty: Morphodynamic anatomy of rhinoplasty. Interest of conservative rhinoplasty.


Authors : Saban Y, Braccini F, Polselli R. (Nice)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2006;127,1:15-22.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Objectives: To highlight the morphodynamic anatomical mechanisms that influence the results of rhinoplasty. To present the technical modalities of nasal dorsum preservation rhinoplasties. To determine the optimized respective surgical indications of the two main techniques of rhinoplasty: interruption rhinoplasty versus conservative rhinoplasty. Materials and Methods: Based on anatomical dissections and initial morphodynamic studies carried out on 100 anatomical specimens, a prospective study of a continuous series of 400 patients operated of primary reduction rhinoplasty or septo-rhinoplasty by one of authors (YS) has been undertaken over a period of ten years (1995-2005) in order to optimize the surgical management of the nasal hump. The studied parameters were: (1) surgical safety, (2) quality of early and late aesthetic result, (3) quality of the functional result, (4) ease of the technical realization of a possible secondary rhinoplasty. The other selected criteria were function of the different nasal hump morphotypes and the expressed wishes of the patients. Results: The anatomical and morphodynamic studies made it possible to better understand the role of the "M" double-arch shape of the nose and the role of the cartilaginous buttresses not only as a function but also the anatomy and the aesthetics of the nose. It is necessary to preserve or repair the arche structures of the septo-triangular and alo-columellar sub-units. The conservative technique, whose results appear much more natural aesthetically, functionally satisfactory and durable over the long term, must be favoured in particular in man and in cases presenting a risk of collapse of the nasal valve. Conclusion: The rhinoplastician must be able to propose, according to the patient’s wishes and in view of the results of the morphological analysis, the most adapted procedure according to his own surgical training but by supporting conservation of the osteo-cartilaginous vault whenever possible.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE