Home Your basket
• New potentialities of the...
   Price 12.50 €
• Prosodic analysis of spee...
   Price 10.50 €
• Endoscopic scale for eval...
   Price 8.50 €
• Fibrous dysplasia, a case...
   Price 10.50 €
• The monaural pseudo-stere...
   Price 8.50 €
• Nasal involvement in Croh...
   Price 10.50 €
• Endoscopic sphenoid proce...
   Price 8.50 €
• Prevalence of sensineural...
   Price 14.00 €
• The «intra-cordal polyp»:...
   Price 5.50 €
• Surgical management of ma...
   Price 10.50 €
• Utility of positron emiss...
   Price 8.50 €
• F0 characteristics in Par...
   Price 12.00 €
• Temporal lift...
   Price 10.50 €
• Laryngeal tracheal post-i...
   Price 8.50 €
• A clinical respiratory ev...
   Price 10.50 €
• Eagle’s syndrome: A case ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Mucoepidermoid carcinomas...
   Price 10.50 €
• Abscess tonsillectomy for...
   Price 10.50 €
• Reconstruction after tumo...
   Price 10.50 €
• Treatment of acute mastoi...
   Price 8.50 €
• Subacute tuberculous otit...
   Price 8.50 €
• Nystagmus and vibratory t...
   Price 10.50 €
• Epidemiology of paediatri...
   Price 10.50 €
• The role of larynx kinest...
   Price 10.50 €
• Bronchoscopic findings in...
   Price 10.50 €
• Merkel cell carcinoma of ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Formant structures of vow...
   Price 10.50 €
• Facial aesthetic lipostru...
   Price 10.50 €
• Stingy speakers....
   Price 5.50 €
• Ethmoid-nasal meningioma ...
   Price 10.00 €
• Identification and locali...
   Price 8.50 €
• The prevention of voice d...
   Price 10.50 €
• Metastatic angiosarcoma t...
   Price 5.50 €
• Esthesioneuroblastoma....
   Price 5.50 €
• A survey of current wound...
   Price 5.50 €
• Nasal cutaneous cryptococ...
   Price 5.50 €
• A protocol for post-opera...
   Price 5.50 €

Total Order 342.00 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 1 - 2004 o

AUDIOLOGY

The effect of the speaker gender on speech intelligibility in normal-hearing subjects with simulated high frequency hearing loss


Authors : M. A. Kiliç, F. Ögüt (Izmir)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2004;125,1:35-38.

Article published in english
Downloadable PDF document english



Summary : Objective: to determine whether speaker gender affects speech discrimination scores, in normal hearing and simulated high frequency hearing loss situations. Materials and Methods: listeners were twenty normal volunteers. The speech stimuli were eight phonetically balanced monosyllabic word lists, uttered by a male and a female speakers. These lists were low-pass filtered at 1500, 2500 and 3500 Hz’s to represent high frequency hearing loss. To obtain speech discrimination scores, the subjects listened to each of the eight lists in a different filtering and talker conditions in a randomized order. For statistical analysis, Mann-Whitney U test was used. Results: in normal hearing situation, the scores obtained by male and female speeches, were similar (p=0.60). On the contrary, statistically significant differences were observed in all of the three high frequency hearing loss situations (p<0.01). Conclusion: Female speech is significantly more difficult to discriminate than male speech in normal-hearing subjects with simulated high frequency hearing loss and probably in patients with high frequency hearing loss.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE