Home Your basket
• Hygiene and sterilisation...
   Price 10.50 €
• Hearing aid : practical a...
   Price 8.50 €
• Metastatic angiosarcoma t...
   Price 5.50 €
• Medicamentous toxic heari...
   Price 5.50 €
• Middle ear osteoma: A rar...
   Price 8.50 €
• Nasal cutaneous cryptococ...
   Price 5.50 €
• How to take a mastoid and...
   Price 8.50 €
• Orbital apex syndrome fol...
   Price 10.50 €
• Voice after supracricoid ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Implications of multiling...
   Price 12.50 €
• Occult otologic fistulas ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Partiturogram: (New) tool...
   Price 10.50 €
• Treatment of children wit...
   Price 8.50 €
• Acceptability of topical ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Hearing preservation in p...
   Price 10.50 €
• Kikuchi-Fujimoto’s diseas...
   Price 5.50 €
• Spontaneous cerebrospinal...
   Price 8.50 €
• Gastro-oesophageal reflux...
   Price 8.50 €
• The outcome of treatments...
   Price 10.50 €
• Multi-factorial analysis ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Reconstruction of the ant...
   Price 8.50 €
• Esthesioneuroblastoma....
   Price 5.50 €
• The supracricoid laryngec...
   Price 10.50 €
• Clinical signs and correl...
   Price 10.50 €
• Contribution of the study...
   Price 10.50 €
• Otomycosis: Clinical and ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Eagle syndrom: A case rep...
   Price 8.50 €
• Giant pleomorphic adenoma...
   Price 5.50 €
• Identification and locali...
   Price 8.50 €
• Notes on voice and speech...
   Price 8.50 €
• Characteristics of the co...
   Price 8.50 €
• Today’s importance of ult...
   Price 14.00 €
• Determination of oesophag...
   Price 10.50 €
• Postural control accordin...
   Price 10.50 €
• Functional anatomy of the...
   Price 14.00 €
• Cervical surgical emphyse...
   Price 5.50 €
• Pleomorphic adenoma of th...
   Price 8.50 €
• A survey of current wound...
   Price 5.50 €
• Endoscopic endonasal surg...
   Price 8.50 €
• Cervical spondylodiskitis...
   Price 5.50 €
• Osteointegrated cranio-fa...
   Price 10.50 €

Total Order 353.50 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 2 - 2005 o

OTOLOGY

Investigations on the tonotopy for patients with a cochlear implant and a hearing aid


Authors : M. Niewiarowicz, O. Stieler (Poznan)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2005;126,2:75-80.

Article published in english
Downloadable PDF document english



Summary : Objective: The aim of investigations was to compare the perception of the pitch of tonal signals by patients using both the cochlear implant and hearing aid. Material and method: The subjective evaluation of the pitch of sound presented through classical acoustic amplification and perceived by the residual hearing was compared with the sound perceived as a result of an electric stimulation. The subjects were 6 patients aged 15-63 (mean 38), diagnosed with postlingual deafness. The comparison of the acoustic signal transmitted via the hearing aid (in the acoustic free field) with the electrical signal from stimulated electrode of the cochlear implant enabled to determine subjectively evaluated shift in the frequency domain. The tonotopic distribution according to the Greenwood’s model compared with the allocation of frequency determined on the basis of cochlear view was also investigated. Results and conclusion: The study has revealed significant differences in the perception of the pitch of sounds perceived through the acoustic stimulation via the hearing aid and the electric stimulation via the implant.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE