Home Your basket
• Diagnostic value of fine-...
   Price 8.50 €
• A schwannoma of the hypog...
   Price 8.50 €
• Results of alginate and h...
   Price 10.50 €
• Side-to-end hypoglossal-f...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cervical approach to a li...
   Price 8.00 €
• Facial nerve outcome af...
   Price 12.50 €
• The cost of running a mul...
   Price 5.50 €
• The three-stage frontal f...
   Price 14.00 €
• Evaluation of rhinologic ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Air rifle pellet injury t...
   Price 5.50 €
• Migraine, neurone and ves...
   Price 5.50 €
• Vascular tumors of the n...
   Price 10.50 €
• Evaluation and treatment ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Peptide receptor radionuc...
   Price 14.00 €
• Cellular, extracellular a...
   Price 10.50 €
• Conference : Medicine of ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Notes on voice and speech...
   Price 8.50 €
• Endoscopic anatomy of the...
   Price 10.50 €
• Hearing aid : practical a...
   Price 8.50 €
• Surgical anatomy of the n...
   Price 10.50 €
• Auditory screening in neo...
   Price 8.50 €
• Experimental study on sim...
   Price 10.50 €
• Diagnosis of non organic ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Rhinoplasty: Advantages a...
   Price 10.50 €
• A comparative study of br...
   Price 10.50 €
• Nasopharyngeal tuberculos...
   Price 5.50 €
• Face and neck lift using ...
   Price 14.00 €
• Adenocarcinoma of the end...
   Price 8.50 €
• Nasal cutaneous cryptococ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Pleomorphic adenoma of th...
   Price 12.00 €

Total Order 280.50 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 5 - 2003 o

PHONIATRICS

Implementation of the European Laryngological Society (ELS)- Basic protocol for assessing voice treatment effect


Authors : DeJonckere PH, Crevier-Buchman L, Marie JP, Moerman M, Remacle M, Woisard V. (European Research Group on the Larynx)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2003;124,5:279-283.

Article published in english
Downloadable PDF document english



Summary : Objectives: 93 patients with various kinds of organic benign voice pathology (vocal fold nodules, polyp, Reinke’s oedema, unilateral paralysis, sulcus/scar) and/or with muscle tension dysphonia, were evaluated before and after their voice treatment (phonosurgery with voice therapy, antireflux medication, or voice therapy alone) in order to check the clinical relevance of a basic multidimensional protocol for assessing functional results of voice treatments, as developed by the Committee on Phoniatrics of the ELS. Materiel and method: The protocol has been used in different university voice clinics. It comprises 5 dimensions: Perception: Grade, Breathiness and Roughness from the GRBAS-scale, rated by two experienced judges: a phoniatrician/laryngologist and a speech therapist. Acoustics: Jitter % and Shimmer % computed on a /a:/, at comfortable loudness and pitch. Also Fo-range and softest possible intensity. Videostroboscopy: Glottal closure, regularity, mucosal wave and symmetry, rated separately. Phonation quotient: computed by dividing the vital capacity (ml) by the maximum phonation time (s) (best value of 2x3 trials). Self rating by the patient: voice quality in itself and general social/ occupational handicap due to the voice problem rated separately. Results: Results show that, at group level, the overall effects for each parameter indicate a significant improvement after treatment. However, the correlations between the pre/post changes for the different parameters are weak (low redundancy). Conclusion: The assessment of voice pathology needs to be multidimensional, as these multidimensional informations about voice changes lead to a better understanding of the actual way in which a treatment works.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE