Home Your basket
• Voice related quality of ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Comparison of three diffe...
   Price 12.00 €
• Revision ossiculoplasty: ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Metastatic melanoma to th...
   Price 5.50 €
• Evaluation in clinical pr...
   Price 10.50 €
• Apology for the biplane c...
   Price 10.50 €
• A remnant tooth in an ede...
   Price 8.50 €
• Fistula of the fourth bra...
   Price 5.50 €
• The pedicle superficial t...
   Price 10.50 €
• Head and neck reconstruct...
   Price 10.50 €
• Efficacy and safety of mo...
   Price 10.50 €
• Ethmoidal metastasis reve...
   Price 8.50 €
• Cellular, extracellular a...
   Price 10.50 €
• A rare tumor of the parap...
   Price 5.50 €
• Phoniatric management of ...
   Price 8.50 €
• The neurotologic evaluati...
   Price 10.50 €
• Study of tongue pressure ...
   Price 12.00 €
• Signs of upper Airways di...
   Price 10.50 €
• Quality of life evaluatio...
   Price 10.50 €
• F0 characteristics in Par...
   Price 12.00 €
• Myofibroma of the mandibu...
   Price 8.50 €
• Surgery of mucocele of th...
   Price 10.50 €
• Value of the preservation...
   Price 14.00 €
• Electrorhinomanometric ev...
   Price 10.50 €
• Contribution to anatomica...
   Price 10.50 €
• Relation between actinomy...
   Price 10.50 €
• Influence of Platelet Ric...
   Price 10.50 €
• From intelligibility to c...
   Price 10.50 €
• Free sorting task of spee...
   Price 10.50 €
• Long term results of tymp...
   Price 5.50 €
• Prevalence of and risk fa...
   Price 10.50 €
• Vertigo and pathology of ...
   Price 10.50 €
• A new case of osseointegr...
   Price 12.50 €

Total Order 328.50 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 5 - 2004 o

LARYNGOLOGY

Voice after supracricoid partial laryngectomy: Comparison of two phonatory mechanisms.


Authors : V. Woisard, A. Rollet, M. Puech, E. Serrano, J. J. Pessey (Toulouse)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2004;125,5:319-324.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Introduction: Different laryngeal phonatory mechanisms may be observed at long term after supracricoid laryngectomy. For this study two mechanisms are differentiated. The «dilated» mechanism is the consequence of a forward movement of the neolarynx creating a new resonance cavity. The «contracted» mechanism tallies with the backward contraction of the base of the tongue and the contraction of the posterior pharyngeal wall compressing the neolarynx. Objective: The aim of the study is to determine if the voice outcome is different between these two kinds of mechanisms. Material and method: The method is based on the selection of a homogeneous group: 12 patients operated by cricoepiglottopexy with a follow up superior to two years and with a stable voice and a full neoglottic closure during phonation. The voice quality and the phonatory mechanism are analysed. Regarding voice assessment, a self evaluation with the vocal handicap index adapted for the study and the GRBAS scale are carried-out. Frequency (usual, minimum, maximum, range) and loudness are used to appreciate the vocal capacities. The phonatory mechanism is studied by videolaryngostroboscopy, performed tongue free, with a normal /e/ and a high-low transition pitch. Results: The outcomes point out a difference between the two mechanisms. The best vocal results are observed in the «dilated» mechanism for the studied parameters and mainly for the frequency parameters. Conclusion: The discovery of numerous phonatory mechanisms after supracricoid laryngectomy independent from neoglottic closure lead us to further studies of the impact of this type of surgery on articulatory patterns.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE