Home Your basket
• Experimental study on sim...
   Price 10.50 €
• F0 characteristics in Par...
   Price 12.00 €
• Cervical liposuction: A r...
   Price 10.50 €
• Interest of the chest CT ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Nasal cutaneous cryptococ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Genotype – phenotype corr...
   Price 8.50 €
• Facial threads for face l...
   Price 10.50 €
• Metastatic angiosarcoma t...
   Price 5.50 €
• A protocol for the evalua...
   Price 8.50 €
• Farber's disease: a cause...
   Price 5.50 €
• Sinonasal malignant melan...
   Price 5.50 €
• Different clinical approa...
   Price 5.50 €
• Investigations on the ton...
   Price 10.50 €
• Vibrant Soundbridge middl...
   Price 10.50 €
• Treatment of children wit...
   Price 8.50 €
• Spontaneous cholesteatoma...
   Price 8.50 €
• Migraine, neurone and ves...
   Price 5.50 €
• Esophageal foreign body: ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Cholesterol granuloma of ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Zenker's diverticulum: Te...
   Price 10.50 €
• Inverted naso-sinus papil...
   Price 10.50 €
• Middle ear osteoma: A rar...
   Price 8.50 €
• How to take a mastoid and...
   Price 8.50 €
• Nasal polyposis: long ter...
   Price 10.50 €
• Study of tongue pressure ...
   Price 12.00 €
• How to manage post staped...
   Price 5.50 €
• Interest of MIBI scintigr...
   Price 10.50 €
• Kikuchi's disease as the ...
   Price 10.50 €
• The emergency in the mana...
   Price 10.50 €
• Posterior cranial fossa a...
   Price 8.50 €
• A protocol for post-opera...
   Price 5.50 €
• Notes on voice and speech...
   Price 8.50 €
• Hearing preservation in p...
   Price 10.50 €
• Plastic surgery indicatio...
   Price 10.50 €
• Evolution of facial nerve...
   Price 10.50 €
• Pleomorphic adenoma of th...
   Price 8.50 €
• Hearing aid : practical a...
   Price 8.50 €
• A survey of current wound...
   Price 5.50 €
• Salivary gland choristoma...
   Price 5.50 €
• Scaling properties of the...
   Price 5.50 €

Total Order 341.00 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 5 - 2005 o

PHONIATRICS

Determination of oesophageal speech intelligibility with an articulation assessment


Authors : M. Azzarello, B. Amy de la Bretèque, R. Garrel, A. Giovanni (Marseille)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2005;126,5:327-334.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Objective: We studied if articulation could determine esophageal speech’s intelligibility. Material and method: To do so, we proposed 30 subjects distributed in three groups based on their speech proficiency level, two preliminary assessments: an articulation assessment and an intelligibility assessment. Results: The study shows a significantly high correlation (86%) between the results of the articulation assessment and the intelligibility assessment in the whole of group studied. However, we noted differences in correlations according to the level of the subjects: in the novices’ group, the percentage reaches 62%, in the medium group, 76%, and in the proficient one: 97%. Conclusion: We concluded that if the results of the articulation assessment is very high, intelligibility will be good. On the other hand, if this percentage is moderate, we can’t evaluate intelligibility only with the articulation factor.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE