Home Your basket
• Validation of a self-asse...
   Price 10.50 €
• Assessing efficacy of voi...
   Price 5.50 €
• A new tongue plate for us...
   Price 5.50 €
• Cellular, extracellular a...
   Price 10.50 €
• Necrotizing external otit...
   Price 10.50 €
• Autologous bone pate in m...
   Price 10.50 €
• Microsurgical reconstruct...
   Price 10.50 €
• Voice Handicap Index adap...
   Price 10.50 €
• Fistulisation of a tuberc...
   Price 5.50 €
• The subjective visual ver...
   Price 10.50 €
• Quality of life after rad...
   Price 10.50 €
• Malignant mixed tumor of ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Distortion product otoaco...
   Price 10.50 €
• The cost of running a mul...
   Price 5.50 €
• Bilateral vestibular loss...
   Price 10.50 €
• Somatic tinnitus (review)...
   Price 12.50 €
• Implications of multiling...
   Price 12.50 €
• Voice prostheses: long-te...
   Price 10.50 €
• Evaluation of quality of ...
   Price 10.50 €
• The nasal framework in rh...
   Price 10.50 €
• Laryngeal schwannoma: A c...
   Price 8.50 €
• Lingual granuloma of preg...
   Price 5.50 €
• Osteoid osteomas in the f...
   Price 5.50 €
• Unusual location of pleom...
   Price 12.50 €
• Metastatic angiosarcoma t...
   Price 5.50 €
• Comparative results of ty...
   Price 10.50 €
• Static management of lago...
   Price 10.50 €
• Acute acoustic trauma, a ...
   Price 12.00 €
• Ruptured pexis after supr...
   Price 10.50 €
• Newborn and infant nasal ...
   Price 5.50 €
• The EXIT procedure: Princ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Prospective evaluation of...
   Price 10.50 €
• A study of consonant inte...
   Price 10.50 €
• Thyroid pseudo-nodules: 3...
   Price 5.50 €
• Is ethmoidal adenocarcino...
   Price 10.50 €
• Salvage composite resecti...
   Price 10.50 €
• Pyogenic granuloma of the...
   Price 8.50 €
• Adenoid cystic carcinoma ...
   Price 5.50 €

Total Order 345.50 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 5 - 2005 o

PHONIATRICS

Evaluation of the handicap by means of the EORTC scales for partial glossectomies


Authors : M. Smadja, Ch. Tessier, M. Ménard, D. Brasnu, L. Crevier-Buchman (Paris)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2005;126,5:315-322.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Objectives: Different treatments for tongue cancer are more and more efficient but there are heavy functional and aesthetic sequels. The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of life after partial glossectomy and to adapt the rehabilitation program after surgery. Methods: Our population of 16 patients (5 females and 11 males), who underwent partial glossectomy, had to quote the auto questionnaire on quality of life (EORTC QOL-C30) and the specific head and neck cancer scale (H&N35). Results: In our population, the patient’s satisfaction for the global quality of life was 71%; the functioning scale was 83%, and the mean rate of generic symptoms was 13%. On the contrary, the specific Head & Neck symptom rate was high, with 76% of complains. Conclusions: The QOL scale could be considered as a good tool for patients to express their difficulties in daily life. It is a reliable and reproducible tool for a follow up study of patients. It allows proposing specific rehabilitation procedures in the post operative period.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE