Home Your basket
• Congenital nasal pyriform...
   Price 5.50 €
• Congenital cyst and fistu...
   Price 10.50 €
• Fronto-ethmoidal fibrous ...
   Price 8.50 €
• A rare tumor of the parap...
   Price 5.50 €
• Balance disorders in the ...
   Price 8.50 €
• A survey of current wound...
   Price 5.50 €
• Karapandzic flap for reco...
   Price 10.50 €
• Clinical implementation o...
   Price 5.50 €
• Hearing aid : practical a...
   Price 8.50 €
• Metastatic angiosarcoma t...
   Price 5.50 €
• Management of cervical ly...
   Price 10.50 €
• Utility of positron emiss...
   Price 8.50 €
• Post intubation collected...
   Price 8.50 €
• Unsteadiness and drunkenn...
   Price 10.50 €
• Nasal cutaneous cryptococ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Middle ear osteoma: A rar...
   Price 8.50 €
• Benign positional vertigo...
   Price 8.50 €
• Modified butterfly cartil...
   Price 10.50 €
• A clinico-radiological st...
   Price 10.50 €
• Relevance of Choukroun’s ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Recent advances in surger...
   Price 5.50 €
• Retropharyngeal abscess i...
   Price 10.50 €
• Primary sub-mandibular gl...
   Price 8.50 €
• Pharyngolaryngectomy for ...
   Price 10.50 €
• A new look on septoplasti...
   Price 10.50 €
• "Bamboo nodes" : a clinic...
   Price 8.50 €
• Using the superficial tem...
   Price 10.50 €
• New technique of myringop...
   Price 5.50 €
• Implications of multiling...
   Price 12.50 €
• Middle ear overpressure w...
   Price 10.50 €
• XVIth World Congress of O...
   Price 8.50 €
• Unilateral endolymphatic ...
   Price 10.50 €
• The EXIT procedure: Princ...
   Price 8.50 €

Total Order 284.50 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 4 - 2002 o

AUDIOLOGY

Usefulness and limitations of speech audiometric testing in the detection of professional nose-induced hearing loss: a comparative study in two groups in the hospital setting.


Authors : E. Babin, A. Bequignon, M. Goullet de Rugy, E. Edy, S. Moreau, J. P. Izard, A. Valdazo (Caen)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2002;123,4:213-217.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Objective: the objective of this study is the evaluation of the calculation of 100% intelligibility threshold and noise resistance index as a monitoring test in populations exposed to noise in their work environment. Method: this is a retrospective exposed-unexposed study as the exposure to the risk factors took place before the survey. The exposed subjects were chosen in principle on sonometric criteria and the unexposed subjects among employees whom we believe were not exposed. The exploration method included history taking, clinical examination, free field audiometry and speech audiometry with background noise. Results: the exposed population has a 100% intelligibility threshold on average equal to 29.69 dB, significantly higher than in the unexposed population where it is calculated at 25.30 dB (p=0.07). The noise resistance index varies with age (p=0.04). Conclusion: our study shows the existence of a significant hearing difference between two populations with different noise exposure. It demonstrates a relationship between a hearing loss risk factor such as noise and the occurrence of the "professional hearing loss" disorder. The calculation of the 100% intelligibility index and the noise resistance index advantageously complements tonal audiometry. These procedures provide a better approach to the social impact of hearing loss but were not useful in the detection of hearing loss.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE