Home Your basket
• From the physiologic perf...
   Price 14.00 €
• Plastic surgery indicatio...
   Price 10.50 €
• New potentialities of the...
   Price 12.50 €
• Vestibular dysfunction af...
   Price 10.50 €
• Positioning in the oropha...
   Price 8.50 €
• Cervical lymph node metas...
   Price 8.50 €
• Role of [18]-FDG PET/CT i...
   Price 10.50 €
• Mycobacterial cervical ly...
   Price 10.50 €
• Why is allergic rhinitis ...
   Price 12.00 €
• Cerebro-spinal fluid otor...
   Price 5.50 €
• Augmentation of the abdom...
   Price 10.50 €
• Oncocytoma of the parotid...
   Price 8.50 €
• Evaluation of the use of ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Sacrifice was an art: The...
   Price 8.50 €
• Unilateral frontal sinus ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Unsteadiness and drunkenn...
   Price 10.50 €
• A post-styloid mass revea...
   Price 12.50 €
• Abscess tonsillectomy for...
   Price 10.50 €
• Value of the preservation...
   Price 14.00 €
• Vocal effectiveness in sp...
   Price 10.50 €
• Aneurysmal bone cyst of t...
   Price 5.50 €
• Outcome of surgical and a...
   Price 10.50 €
• The use of ultrasound eva...
   Price 8.50 €
• Context influence on the ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cervical and pharyngeal i...
   Price 5.50 €
• Personal experience about...
   Price 10.50 €
• Results of alginate and h...
   Price 10.50 €
• A single appointment with...
   Price 8.50 €
• Comparative study of anal...
   Price 14.00 €
• Management of cervical ce...
   Price 10.50 €
• Mucormycosis – early diag...
   Price 10.50 €
• Endobronchial lipomas and...
   Price 5.50 €
• Nasal cutaneous cryptococ...
   Price 5.50 €
• A sphenoidal mucocele wit...
   Price 8.50 €
• Notes on voice and speech...
   Price 8.50 €
• Complicated fungal sinusi...
   Price 8.50 €
• Chyle leak after cervical...
   Price 15.00 €
• Hearing aid : practical a...
   Price 8.50 €
• A survey of current wound...
   Price 5.50 €
• Tuberculous acute mastoid...
   Price 5.50 €
• Optimizing vocal efficien...
   Price 8.50 €

Total Order 390.00 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 5 - 2007 o

PHONIATRICS

Evolution of voice assessment and quality of life after endoscopic laser cordectomy


Authors : Crevier-Buchman L, Colomb I, Hans S, Vaissière J, Brasnu D. (Paris)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2007;128,5:315-320.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Objectives: Endoscopic laser cordectomy is a minimally invasive surgical technique for Tis, T1 and selected T2 glottic carcinoma. The purpose of the study was to evaluate prospectively pre-operatively and 3 months after surgery i) acoustic and perceptual parameters, ii) quality of life through a self evaluation (VHI) test. Methods: A prospective longitudinal evaluation of 13 male patients, shared-out onto 3 surgical procedures (cordectomy type I, grouped type II and III, and type V). Patients were recorded before and at 1 and 3 months after surgery. The parameters recorded were; acoustic parameters (F0, Jitter, Shimmer), Maximum Phonation Time (MPT), perceptual evaluation using the GRBAS scale and the self evaluation scale with the Voice Handicap Index (VHI). Results: No statistics could be done because of the limited number of patients in each group. Perceptual and self evaluation data showed a favorable progression between 1 and 3 months for patients in group Type I, II and III cordectomy. Evolution of acoustic parameters is more difficult to analyze. The voice of the Cordectomy type V group remains whispery at 3 months after surgery. Conclusion: The quality of voice is a very important criterion for the patients. During the first 3 months after laser cordectomy, the perceptual vocal function and the self evaluation improves. But for the acoustic data, 3 months is probably too short to objectively quantify an improvement especially after type V cordectomy.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE