Home Your basket
• Nasal cutaneous cryptococ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Study on the modeling of ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Botulinum toxin and rejuv...
   Price 10.50 €
• Vocal effectiveness in sp...
   Price 10.50 €
• One-stage surgery of midd...
   Price 8.50 €
• Interest of hypnotherapy ...
   Price 10.50 €
• The clinical significance...
   Price 5.50 €
• Stingy speakers....
   Price 5.50 €
• Blepharoplasty and upper ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Parapharyngeal tumours: M...
   Price 10.50 €
• MIF in Head and Neck canc...
   Price 10.50 €
• Polymorphisms of the huma...
   Price 10.50 €
• Clinical signs and correl...
   Price 10.50 €
• Central auditory processi...
   Price 10.50 €
• Evaluation of a dysphonic...
   Price 10.50 €
• The Bell Labs contributio...
   Price 12.50 €
• Acoustic neuroma surgery....
   Price 10.50 €
• Bilateral and recurrent f...
   Price 5.50 €
• Assessment of migraine re...
   Price 8.50 €
• Esthesioneuroblastoma....
   Price 5.50 €
• Correlation between the r...
   Price 12.50 €
• Determination of oesophag...
   Price 10.50 €
• Metastatic angiosarcoma t...
   Price 5.50 €
• F0 characteristics in Par...
   Price 12.00 €
• Benign positional vertigo...
   Price 8.50 €
• Modern lipostructure: The...
   Price 10.50 €
• How to take a mastoid and...
   Price 8.50 €
• Bilateral abductor vocal ...
   Price 14.00 €
• Does indermil glue improv...
   Price 5.50 €
• Transsexuality: Speech th...
   Price 10.50 €
• Free novascularized bone ...
   Price 15.00 €
• Prosodic analysis of spee...
   Price 10.50 €
• Clinical implementation o...
   Price 5.50 €
• Changing patterns of bucc...
   Price 10.50 €
• Vocalab: A new software f...
   Price 8.50 €

Total Order 331.00 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 4 - 2014 o

OTOLOGY

Cochlear implantation in patients with chronic otitis media and radical mastoidectomy: A single-stage procedure


Authors : Piché M, Côté M, Philippon D, Laflamme N, Bussières R.

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2014;135,4:175-180.

Article published in english
Downloadable PDF document english



Summary : Background: We conducted a retrospective case review of patients with mastoid cavity and active or inactive chronic otitis media (COM) who underwent cochlear implantation and ear obliteration in a single-stage procedure. The objectives of this review are to assess the rates of complications and postoperative infections and to evaluate post-implantation audiologic perfor­mance. Materials and methods: All patients with COM and mastoid cavity, associated or not with active disease, who undergo cochlear implantation and obliteration of the ear as a single-stage procedure from November 2004 to April 2013, were included in the review. All the complications were recorded. Open-set sentence scores were used to evaluate the audiologic gain after implantation. Results: Twenty-seven patients were included in our review: ten with active COM and seventeen with inactive COM. Overall, nine patients (9/27) presented post­operative complications (7/9 were minor): three were amongst active COM patients (30%) as compared to six amongst inactive COM patients (35%), which included the two major compli­ca­tions. A mean gain of 55.9% on open-set sentence scores was obtained after cochlear implantation. Discussion: We found that complications rate of the one-stage cochlear implantation was higher in patients with COM than in global implant population, but most complications were minors and there was no statistical difference between active and inactive COM. In addition, these patients had audiologic scores similar to those found in patients with normal temporal bone anatomy. Conclusion: Cochlear implantation performed as a one-stage procedure could be considered as an option of treatment to avoid staging in patients with active and inactive COM. Although these patients need a regular follow-up, they present good post-implantation audio­metric scores.

Price : 12.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE