Home Your basket
• Life after total laryngec...
   Price 8.50 €
• Reliability of CT-Scan in...
   Price 8.50 €
• Partial allotransplantati...
   Price 10.50 €
• Supra and infra hyoid mid...
   Price 10.50 €
• A survey of current wound...
   Price 5.50 €
• Temporal lift...
   Price 10.50 €
• Mucus physiopathology, up...
   Price 12.50 €
• Surgery of the semicircul...
   Price 12.50 €
• Enlarged marginal incisio...
   Price 10.50 €
• Sentinel lymph node biops...
   Price 15.00 €
• «Mini-rhinoplasty»...
   Price 10.50 €
• Actinomycosis of the midd...
   Price 5.50 €
• The sound intensity after...
   Price 10.50 €
• Comparison of stapes prot...
   Price 15.00 €
• Use of a laryngeal mask d...
   Price 8.50 €
• Cerebrospinal fluid rhino...
   Price 12.00 €
• The complications of end...
   Price 8.50 €
• Experimental study on sim...
   Price 10.50 €
• Sarcoidosis of the thyroi...
   Price 12.50 €
• Early evaluation of voice...
   Price 12.00 €
• Pneumoparotid: a case rep...
   Price 8.50 €
• Pharyngolaryngectomy for ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Hypersensitivity to inhal...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cervical cystic lymphangi...
   Price 5.50 €
• Extraction of the esophag...
   Price 8.50 €
• Somatic tinnitus (review)...
   Price 12.50 €
• Validation of a self-asse...
   Price 10.50 €
• Chondrocalcinosis of the ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Modern lipostructure: The...
   Price 10.50 €
• Communication disorders m...
   Price 5.50 €
• Cytokines profile in cyst...
   Price 10.50 €
• Is it possible to evolve ...
   Price 8.50 €
• From barotrauma otitis to...
   Price 8.50 €
• Analysis of the possibili...
   Price 8.50 €
• Nasal septal abscess: A c...
   Price 5.50 €
• Psychosocial quality of l...
   Price 10.50 €

Total Order 353.00 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 1 - 2012 o

PHONIATRICS

Understanding the use of self-evaluation questionnaires when assessing a patient’s swallowing capacity and performing follow-up activities


Authors : Lauret Corthay D, Garnier Paillusseau L, Borel S, Tessier C, Sauvignet A, Crevier-Buchman L. (Paris)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2012;133,1:19-26.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : The purpose of this study was to examine the possibility of improving the assessment protocol of dysphagia and show the interest of adding a self-assessment evaluation scale to the traditional functional assessment of the swallowing process. We have a comparison of the assessment of 30 dysphagic patients with two different scales (DHI and EAT-10). Results show that the self-evaluation scales selected led to quantitative data comparable to the objective results of the COLP-FR-G func­tio­nal assessment tool. We may therefore conclude that the patients’ own feelings do not differ from the results of the clini­cal dysphagia severity assessment. Results also highlight that both scales provide similar information in terms of content and also reflect the evolution of objective data. The EAT-10 scale, by its simplicity and limited number of questions, could be proposed as a screening test in neurological patients and geria­tric population, where the DHI scale, with its three sub-domains (physical, functional and emotional), would be a complementary tool for the functional swallowing evaluation. Indeed, in order to evaluate dysphagia, the association of DHI, EAT-10 and COLP-FR-G offers several advantages. This proto­col is convenient and rapid to administrate, it takes the diversity of etiologies into account and its score is easy to transmit to the patients’ medical practitioners. Consequently, its use in the assessment of swallowing functions should be encouraged as a consistent part of the clinical practice.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE