Home Your basket
• New trends in rhinoplasty...
   Price 10.50 €
• Overlay versus underlay t...
   Price 10.50 €
• Papillary carcinoma arisi...
   Price 5.50 €
• Virtual audiovisual talki...
   Price 10.50 €
• Adenocarcinoma of the end...
   Price 8.50 €
• Necrotizing external otit...
   Price 10.50 €
• Treatments of hereditary ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Early PTH assay after tot...
   Price 10.50 €
• Metastatic angiosarcoma t...
   Price 5.50 €
• From barotrauma otitis to...
   Price 8.50 €
• High click stimulus repet...
   Price 10.50 €
• Evaluation and treatment ...
   Price 8.50 €
• An unusual fester of the ...
   Price 8.50 €
• «Mini-rhinoplasty»...
   Price 10.50 €
• Evaluation of quality of ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Papillary thyroid microca...
   Price 8.50 €
• Benign paroxysmal vertigo...
   Price 8.50 €
• A survey of current wound...
   Price 5.50 €
• The benefit of phoniatric...
   Price 8.50 €
• Study of the supra-glotti...
   Price 10.50 €
• The silent sinus syndrome...
   Price 12.50 €
• MIF in Head and Neck canc...
   Price 10.50 €
• A non-linear model of lar...
   Price 10.50 €
• Laryngeal neuroendocrin c...
   Price 5.50 €
• Cholesteatoma by osteoma ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Otolaryngological aspects...
   Price 8.50 €
• Sinonasal hemangiopericyt...
   Price 8.50 €
• Pleomorphic adenoma of th...
   Price 8.50 €
• Post-operative complicati...
   Price 10.50 €
• Vestibular neuritis: aeti...
   Price 8.50 €
• Treatment of acute mastoi...
   Price 8.50 €
• Prosodic features of comp...
   Price 10.50 €
• Surgical anatomy of the f...
   Price 10.50 €
• A specific plain X-ray in...
   Price 8.50 €
• Osteoblastoma of the eth...
   Price 10.50 €
• Inferior turbinate hypert...
   Price 10.50 €
• Bilateral facial nerve sc...
   Price 10.50 €
• Vascular tumors of the n...
   Price 10.50 €
• Non-functioning parathyro...
   Price 5.50 €

Total Order 358.50 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 1 - 2004 o

AUDIOLOGY

The effect of the speaker gender on speech intelligibility in normal-hearing subjects with simulated high frequency hearing loss


Authors : M. A. Kiliç, F. Ögüt (Izmir)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2004;125,1:35-38.

Article published in english
Downloadable PDF document english



Summary : Objective: to determine whether speaker gender affects speech discrimination scores, in normal hearing and simulated high frequency hearing loss situations. Materials and Methods: listeners were twenty normal volunteers. The speech stimuli were eight phonetically balanced monosyllabic word lists, uttered by a male and a female speakers. These lists were low-pass filtered at 1500, 2500 and 3500 Hz’s to represent high frequency hearing loss. To obtain speech discrimination scores, the subjects listened to each of the eight lists in a different filtering and talker conditions in a randomized order. For statistical analysis, Mann-Whitney U test was used. Results: in normal hearing situation, the scores obtained by male and female speeches, were similar (p=0.60). On the contrary, statistically significant differences were observed in all of the three high frequency hearing loss situations (p<0.01). Conclusion: Female speech is significantly more difficult to discriminate than male speech in normal-hearing subjects with simulated high frequency hearing loss and probably in patients with high frequency hearing loss.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE