Home contents
2016
   N# 1 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 3 - 2004 o

OTOLOGY

Failure rate and revision surgery in ossiculoplasty with Kurz titanium prosthesis


Authors : D.-Q. Nguyen, J.-P. Lavieille, S. Schmerber (Grenoble)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2004;125,3:157-162.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Despite its excellent biocompatibility, failures and in particular extrusion of the prosthesis have been described in ossiculoplasty with titanium prosthesis. Objective: Report our experience with revision ossicular recontruction in ossiculoplasty with Kurz prosthesis. Identify causes of failure in ossiculoplasty using the titanium prosthesis. Material and Methods: Retrospective chart reviews were performed for 110 patients who had undergone titanium ossicular implants between November 1998 and 2002. All patients had undergone ossiculoplasty using titanium middle ear implants. Patients were divided into 2 groups: in group 1 patients underwent revision ossiculoplasty; in group 2 patients had a successful surgery at first stage. Anatomic and functional results have been studied in these two groups. Causes of failures were analysed. Results: The overall failure rate was 20% (22/110). Twenty patients underwent revision ossiculoplasty. Nine primary failures were attributable to a short implant. Two extrusions were observed. At long term follow-up, the functional gain between the primary and revision ossiculoplasty was comparable. Conclusion: Revision ossiculoplasty is worthwhile for those patients who have failure of the titanium prosthesis in ossiculoplasty. A large cartilage graft interposition is necessary to prevent extrusion. The overall luxation rate observed in our series was mainly due to a too short prosthesis and we recommend now a reconstruction with longer prosthesis.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2017 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE