Home Your basket
• Voice handicap evaluation...
   Price 10.50 €
• Congenital absence of the...
   Price 8.50 €
• Defects in accuracy of th...
   Price 10.50 €
• The effect of the speaker...
   Price 10.50 €
• Zoom of the ENT French So...
   Price 5.50 €
• A survey of current wound...
   Price 5.50 €
• Hearing aid : practical a...
   Price 8.50 €
• Metastatic angiosarcoma t...
   Price 5.50 €
• Cervical lymph node metas...
   Price 8.50 €
• Evaluation of the presenc...
   Price 12.50 €
• Comparison between extern...
   Price 10.50 €
• Postural control accordin...
   Price 10.50 €
• Recurrences of pleomorphi...
   Price 10.50 €
• Metastatic melanoma to th...
   Price 5.50 €
• Migrant foreign body of t...
   Price 10.50 €
• A non-linear model of lar...
   Price 10.50 €
• A protocol for the evalua...
   Price 8.50 €
• Wegener granulomatosis mi...
   Price 14.00 €
• A remnant tooth in an ede...
   Price 8.50 €
• Nasal septal abscess: A c...
   Price 5.50 €
• Personal experience about...
   Price 10.50 €
• Pathophysiology, assessme...
   Price 12.50 €
• Electrorhinomanometric ev...
   Price 10.50 €
• Notes on voice and speech...
   Price 8.50 €
• Changing patterns of bucc...
   Price 10.50 €
• Nasal cutaneous cryptococ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Invasive cholesteatoma in...
   Price 10.50 €
• Bone anchored hearing aid...
   Price 8.50 €
• Predictive factors for su...
   Price 15.00 €
• Association of thyroid he...
   Price 12.50 €
• Preliminary experimental ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Medical rhinoplasty: Rati...
   Price 10.00 €
• Evolution of voice assess...
   Price 10.50 €
• Hearing aids rehabilitati...
   Price 12.50 €
• Cholesteatoma and osteora...
   Price 14.00 €

Total Order 342.50 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 2 - 2012 o

OTOLOGY

Deafness in adults. Study of practices in general medicine


Authors : Leveque P, Kossowski M, Pons Y. (Clamart)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2012;133,2:59-66.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Introduction: Deafness is a sensory disability responsible for communication disorder, sometimes impairing social life. In children, the hearing is an important concern for all stake­holders in early childhood (systematic neonatal screening, etc.). On the other hand, in the adult, it is rarely tested, and patients do consult when their audiometric status is already badly impaired. But their care is all the better if the deafness diagnosis is made early, as for the audio-prosthetic rehabi­li­ta­tion for example. Today, the general practitioner is the first link of the diagnostic and therapeutic management chain. The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic practices of practitioners in front of deafness in adults. Subjects and methods: This prospective study included 74 practitioners ba­sed in “Ile de France” interviewed using a multiple choice ques­­tion­naire (MCQ) on otoscopic and audiometric diagnostics and a Script Concordance test (SC) on clinical adult deafness situa­tions validated by a 5 experts panel. Results: The obtained average score was 66.35% of correct answers to the MCQ and 47.76% to the SC. Conclusions: In our study, the surveyed practitioners showed a good level of otoscopic and audiometric diagnosis in the MCQ. However, their answers were not concor­dant with those of the expert panel in the SC. They have been particularly poorly performing on issues related to func­tional signs and their use in a given clinical situation, often driving to establish an otoscopic misdiagnosis while their diagnostic recognition of a pathological eardrum in the MCQ was rather good. These results reflect a lack of confidence in their otoscopic diagnosis related to the lack of knowledge of the causes of deafness in adults and their symptoms.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE