Home Your basket
• Hearing disorders at the ...
   Price 12.50 €
• Sphenoid arachnoidocele: ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Prospective evaluation of...
   Price 10.50 €
• Transverse maxillary defi...
   Price 8.50 €
• Ambulatory stapedectomy: ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Non-traumatic nasal septa...
   Price 8.50 €
• Interstitial brachytherap...
   Price 8.50 €
• Cephalic vein access for ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Efficacy of voice therapy...
   Price 10.50 €
• Spontaneous subcutaneous ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Cervical spondylodiskitis...
   Price 5.50 €
• How to predict post thyro...
   Price 12.00 €
• Inferior turbinate hypert...
   Price 10.50 €
• Vocal and behavioral adap...
   Price 10.50 €
• When to suspect a perilym...
   Price 10.50 €
• Diagnosis and treatment o...
   Price 8.50 €
• Failure rate and revision...
   Price 10.50 €
• Notes on voice and speech...
   Price 8.50 €
• Endoscopic scale for eval...
   Price 8.50 €
• Lengthening temporalis my...
   Price 10.50 €
• Evaluation of the primary...
   Price 5.50 €
• Acquired non tumoral lary...
   Price 12.00 €
• Aneurysmal bone cyst of t...
   Price 5.50 €
• Evaluation of the use of ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Cochlear implants in chil...
   Price 10.50 €
• Usher type I syndrome in ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cochlear implant in elder...
   Price 10.50 €
• Benign paroxysmal positio...
   Price 10.50 €
• Acoustic study of sustain...
   Price 10.50 €
• Using the superficial tem...
   Price 10.50 €
• Autologous cartilaginous ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Diagnosis and treatment o...
   Price 10.50 €
• Comparison between extern...
   Price 10.50 €
• Chondrosarcoma of the hyo...
   Price 12.50 €

Total Order 326.00 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 1 - 2004 o

AUDIOLOGY

The effect of the speaker gender on speech intelligibility in normal-hearing subjects with simulated high frequency hearing loss


Authors : M. A. Kiliç, F. Ögüt (Izmir)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2004;125,1:35-38.

Article published in english
Downloadable PDF document english



Summary : Objective: to determine whether speaker gender affects speech discrimination scores, in normal hearing and simulated high frequency hearing loss situations. Materials and Methods: listeners were twenty normal volunteers. The speech stimuli were eight phonetically balanced monosyllabic word lists, uttered by a male and a female speakers. These lists were low-pass filtered at 1500, 2500 and 3500 Hz’s to represent high frequency hearing loss. To obtain speech discrimination scores, the subjects listened to each of the eight lists in a different filtering and talker conditions in a randomized order. For statistical analysis, Mann-Whitney U test was used. Results: in normal hearing situation, the scores obtained by male and female speeches, were similar (p=0.60). On the contrary, statistically significant differences were observed in all of the three high frequency hearing loss situations (p<0.01). Conclusion: Female speech is significantly more difficult to discriminate than male speech in normal-hearing subjects with simulated high frequency hearing loss and probably in patients with high frequency hearing loss.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE