Home Your basket
• Necrotizing external otit...
   Price 10.50 €
• A new technique for the u...
   Price 5.50 €
• Extramuscular soft tissue...
   Price 8.50 €
• A case of nasal foreign b...
   Price 8.50 €
• Skull vibratory test in p...
   Price 10.50 €
• XVIth World Congress of O...
   Price 8.50 €
• Acoustic analysis of the ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Benign positional vertigo...
   Price 8.50 €
• Myringoplasties for anter...
   Price 10.50 €
• The complications of end...
   Price 8.50 €
• Validation of a self asse...
   Price 10.50 €
• Assessing efficacy of voi...
   Price 5.50 €
• Focus on the BPPV: Semont...
   Price 12.50 €
• Benign tumors of the nasa...
   Price 14.00 €
• Arteriovenous haemangioma...
   Price 8.50 €
• Aspects of voice quality ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Endoscopic endonasal surg...
   Price 8.50 €
• Neurofibromatosis Type1 r...
   Price 8.50 €
• Voice prostheses: long-te...
   Price 10.50 €
• Research in cancer : adva...
   Price 5.50 €
• Laryngeal neuroendocrin c...
   Price 5.50 €
• Treatment of severe epist...
   Price 5.50 €
• The frontal pneumosinus d...
   Price 8.50 €
• Mucosal melanomas of the ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Microsurgical reconstruct...
   Price 10.50 €
• Hearing aid : practical a...
   Price 8.50 €
• Notes on voice and speech...
   Price 8.50 €
• Intrapetrous cholesteatom...
   Price 10.50 €
• Diagnosis and treatment o...
   Price 10.50 €
• Orbital decompression in ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Laryngeal schwannoma: A c...
   Price 8.50 €
• Adenocarcinoma of the eth...
   Price 8.50 €

Total Order 283.50 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 1 - 2006 o

PLASTIC SURGERY

Rhinoplasty: Morphodynamic anatomy of rhinoplasty. Interest of conservative rhinoplasty.


Authors : Saban Y, Braccini F, Polselli R. (Nice)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2006;127,1:15-22.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Objectives: To highlight the morphodynamic anatomical mechanisms that influence the results of rhinoplasty. To present the technical modalities of nasal dorsum preservation rhinoplasties. To determine the optimized respective surgical indications of the two main techniques of rhinoplasty: interruption rhinoplasty versus conservative rhinoplasty. Materials and Methods: Based on anatomical dissections and initial morphodynamic studies carried out on 100 anatomical specimens, a prospective study of a continuous series of 400 patients operated of primary reduction rhinoplasty or septo-rhinoplasty by one of authors (YS) has been undertaken over a period of ten years (1995-2005) in order to optimize the surgical management of the nasal hump. The studied parameters were: (1) surgical safety, (2) quality of early and late aesthetic result, (3) quality of the functional result, (4) ease of the technical realization of a possible secondary rhinoplasty. The other selected criteria were function of the different nasal hump morphotypes and the expressed wishes of the patients. Results: The anatomical and morphodynamic studies made it possible to better understand the role of the "M" double-arch shape of the nose and the role of the cartilaginous buttresses not only as a function but also the anatomy and the aesthetics of the nose. It is necessary to preserve or repair the arche structures of the septo-triangular and alo-columellar sub-units. The conservative technique, whose results appear much more natural aesthetically, functionally satisfactory and durable over the long term, must be favoured in particular in man and in cases presenting a risk of collapse of the nasal valve. Conclusion: The rhinoplastician must be able to propose, according to the patient’s wishes and in view of the results of the morphological analysis, the most adapted procedure according to his own surgical training but by supporting conservation of the osteo-cartilaginous vault whenever possible.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE