Home Your basket
• Zenker's diverticulum: Te...
   Price 10.50 €
• Chronic laryngitis...
   Price 8.50 €
• Bullet in the pharynx: En...
   Price 10.50 €
• Meniere disease : news....
   Price 10.50 €
• Major orbital complicatio...
   Price 8.50 €
• Laryngeal neuroendocrin c...
   Price 5.50 €
• Usher type I syndrome in ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Nasal cutaneous cryptococ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Exophthalmos arising from...
   Price 10.50 €
• Otomycosis: Clinical and ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Study of the predictive v...
   Price 10.50 €
• Inflammatory pathology an...
   Price 10.50 €
• Migrant foreign body of t...
   Price 10.50 €
• Two cases of primary mali...
   Price 8.50 €
• The cholesteatomatous rin...
   Price 5.50 €
• Treatments of hereditary ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Spontaneous subcutaneous ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Kikuchi's disease as the ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Callas or the trajectory ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Facial nerve monitoring i...
   Price 10.50 €
• Laryngeal tuberculosis: a...
   Price 8.50 €
• New trends in rhinoplasty...
   Price 10.50 €
• Hearing aid : practical a...
   Price 8.50 €
• Laryngeal pemphigus...
   Price 5.50 €
• Vocal fold structure and ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Pyogenic granuloma of the...
   Price 8.50 €
• Solitary myofibroma of th...
   Price 5.50 €
• Allergic and pneumologic ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Formant structures of vow...
   Price 10.50 €
• Papillary thyroid carcino...
   Price 10.50 €
• Post-traumatic otoscleros...
   Price 8.50 €
• Toxic nodular goitre asso...
   Price 5.50 €
• Lysis of the incus long p...
   Price 10.50 €
• Management of peritonsill...
   Price 5.50 €
• Ruptured pexis after supr...
   Price 10.50 €
• Diagnosis management of W...
   Price 10.50 €
• What we don’t know about ...
   Price 12.50 €

Total Order 329.50 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 4 - 2002 o

AUDIOLOGY

Usefulness and limitations of speech audiometric testing in the detection of professional nose-induced hearing loss: a comparative study in two groups in the hospital setting.


Authors : E. Babin, A. Bequignon, M. Goullet de Rugy, E. Edy, S. Moreau, J. P. Izard, A. Valdazo (Caen)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2002;123,4:213-217.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Objective: the objective of this study is the evaluation of the calculation of 100% intelligibility threshold and noise resistance index as a monitoring test in populations exposed to noise in their work environment. Method: this is a retrospective exposed-unexposed study as the exposure to the risk factors took place before the survey. The exposed subjects were chosen in principle on sonometric criteria and the unexposed subjects among employees whom we believe were not exposed. The exploration method included history taking, clinical examination, free field audiometry and speech audiometry with background noise. Results: the exposed population has a 100% intelligibility threshold on average equal to 29.69 dB, significantly higher than in the unexposed population where it is calculated at 25.30 dB (p=0.07). The noise resistance index varies with age (p=0.04). Conclusion: our study shows the existence of a significant hearing difference between two populations with different noise exposure. It demonstrates a relationship between a hearing loss risk factor such as noise and the occurrence of the "professional hearing loss" disorder. The calculation of the 100% intelligibility index and the noise resistance index advantageously complements tonal audiometry. These procedures provide a better approach to the social impact of hearing loss but were not useful in the detection of hearing loss.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE