Home Your basket
• Notes on voice and speech...
   Price 8.50 €
• Revascularized free scapu...
   Price 10.50 €
• Hearing results in stapes...
   Price 10.50 €
• Nystagmus and vibratory t...
   Price 10.50 €
• Pathophysiology of choles...
   Price 10.50 €
• Vibrant Soundbridge middl...
   Price 10.50 €
• Follow up of tracheostoma...
   Price 12.00 €
• Allergic and pneumologic ...
   Price 8.50 €
• The cost of running a mul...
   Price 5.50 €
• A perceptual study of the...
   Price 8.50 €
• A survey of current wound...
   Price 5.50 €
• Hearing aid : practical a...
   Price 8.50 €
• Tuberculous acute mastoid...
   Price 5.50 €
• Context influence on the ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Prosody and reading: Temp...
   Price 12.00 €
• Otosclerosis among patien...
   Price 10.50 €
• Metastatic angiosarcoma t...
   Price 5.50 €
• Ganglioneuroma in saharan...
   Price 10.00 €
• Post intubation collected...
   Price 8.50 €
• Management of labial inco...
   Price 10.50 €
• The effect of the speaker...
   Price 10.50 €
• Aesthetic parotidectomy: ...
   Price 8.50 €
• A case of nasal NK/T cell...
   Price 5.50 €
• The sound intensity after...
   Price 10.50 €
• Decompression surgery for...
   Price 8.50 €
• The “Deglutition Handicap...
   Price 10.50 €
• Prosodic analysis of spee...
   Price 10.50 €
• Description of complicati...
   Price 5.50 €
• Focus on the BPPV: Semont...
   Price 12.50 €
• Nasal cutaneous cryptococ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Idiopathic sudden deafnes...
   Price 10.50 €
• Transverse maxillary defi...
   Price 8.50 €

Total Order 289.50 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 2 - 2015 o

HEAD AND NECK CARCINOLOGY

Value of the preservation of an osseous mandibular rim with a fibula free flap reconstruction


Authors : Cortese S, Phulpin B, Mastronicola R, Gangloff P, Guillet J, Roch M, Julien L, Verhaeghe JL, Dolivet G. (Vandœuvre les Nancy)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2015;136,2:61-66.

Article published in english
Downloadable PDF document english



Summary : Background: Reconstruction of the mandible with micro­vascularized fibula transplants is actually a well-established procedure, yet the major component is the limited diameter of the diaphysis that can induce oral rehabilitation’s failure, especially in dentate patients. In this paper, we report our surgi­cal procedure allowing preservation of the mandibular height. The primary objective was to assess aesthetic and func­tional improvements of preservation of an osseous mandibular rim with a fibula free flap reconstruction. Patients and methods: Five patients (all males, mean age of 60 years) were treated with this method. Aetiologies were tumour in 3 cases, and osteo­radionecrosis in the two others cases. We described all step of our surgical procedure and the functional, aesthetic and carcinologic results were evaluated. The follow up varies from 6 to 30 months. Results: One patient died at 12 days from unre­la­ted affection. For the other patients, both the aesthetics and functional outcomes were better than in case of mandibular interruption surgery. In fact, the mandibular contour of the mandibule was preserved and the height of mandible was restored. One patient is in progress of dental rehabilitation with osseous implants. Carcinologically, no local recurrence was observed. Conclusion: This technique is reliable and enables to optimize oral rehabilitation with endosteal implants. Nevertheless, we consider that the 3D scanner is essential before the intervention to evaluate the osseous reach. Moreover, if necessarily the procedure can be modified intraoperatively.

Price : 14.00 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE