Home Your basket
• Morbidity of neck dissect...
   Price 15.00 €
• Merkel cell carcinoma of ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Hearing aid : practical a...
   Price 8.50 €
• Middle ear adenoma / carc...
   Price 8.50 €
• Non-traumatic nasal septa...
   Price 8.50 €
• Cholesteatoma behind a no...
   Price 10.50 €
• A survey of current wound...
   Price 5.50 €
• Benign paroxysmal positio...
   Price 10.50 €
• Rhinoplasty: Advantages a...
   Price 10.50 €
• New technique of myringop...
   Price 5.50 €
• Unilateral laryngeal para...
   Price 10.50 €
• Hearing evaluation on you...
   Price 8.50 €
• Association of Bezold’s a...
   Price 8.50 €
• Metastatic angiosarcoma t...
   Price 5.50 €
• A single appointment with...
   Price 8.50 €
• Endoscopic endonasal surg...
   Price 8.50 €
• Influence of phonetic con...
   Price 10.50 €
• Osteoblastoma of the eth...
   Price 10.50 €
• Notes on voice and speech...
   Price 8.50 €
• Diagnosis and treatment o...
   Price 10.50 €
• Vestibular neuritis: Eval...
   Price 14.00 €
• Inferior turbinate hypert...
   Price 10.50 €
• Reconstruction of the ant...
   Price 8.50 €
• Case report on a nasal gl...
   Price 5.50 €
• Bilateral paranasal sinus...
   Price 8.50 €
• Experimental study on sim...
   Price 10.50 €
• Unilateral frontal sinus ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Rejuvenation of the eye: ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Interest of hypnotherapy ...
   Price 10.50 €
• MIF in Head and Neck canc...
   Price 10.50 €
• Pyogenic granuloma of the...
   Price 8.50 €
• Sinonasal hemangiopericyt...
   Price 5.50 €
• Congenital cyst and fistu...
   Price 10.50 €
• Prospective evaluation of...
   Price 10.50 €
• Rhinoplasty: Morphodynami...
   Price 10.50 €
• Fronto-ethmoidal mucocele...
   Price 8.50 €
• Dysphonia and cervical hy...
   Price 5.50 €
• Salvage composite resecti...
   Price 10.50 €
• External versus endoscopi...
   Price 14.00 €
• Allergic and pneumologic ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Glomangioma or "glomic tu...
   Price 5.50 €
• Association of thyroid he...
   Price 12.50 €
• Exophthalmos arising from...
   Price 10.50 €
• Laryngeal neuroendocrin c...
   Price 5.50 €
• Temporal lift...
   Price 10.50 €
• Paediatric endoscopic sin...
   Price 10.50 €

Total Order 426.50 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 2 - 2014 o

SWALLOWING

Validity of cervical auscultation in the screening for aspiration


Authors : Al Hawat A, Woisard V, Perez-Begout L, Sarrabère E, Grand S, Puech M. (Toulouse)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2014;135,2:51-56.

Article published in english
Downloadable PDF document english



Summary : Introduction: Cervical auscultation could improve the performance of bedside swallowing test to predict aspiration, especially silent aspiration. The aim of this study is to compare the predictive values of bedside swallowing test performed with and without cervical auscultation by logopedist students who had intensive training on cervical auscultation. Materials and methods: 64 patients were included in the study. They all underwent swallowing test alone, combined swallowing test and cervical auscultation, and videofluoroscopic swallowing study as defined gold standard. Two logopedist students, at the end of their training, performed the auscultation and noted their results. Results: 128 tests were performed, 96% of the tests were judged positive for aspiration. When comparing the results of the two different clinical tests, the detection of clinical signs is not improved by the addition of auscultation. Using a penetration aspiration scale threshold >5, the area under the curve measured for the swallowing test alone was significantly higher than that measured for the combined tests (p= 0.03) (0.66 for the swallowing test alone (95% CI between 0.49 and 0.83), and 0.50 for the combined tests (95% CI between 0.31 and 0.69). Conclusion: This study showed no advantage in performing cervical auscultation with bedside swallowing test. Cervical auscultation seems to hamper the assessment, mainly the perception of wet voice and laryngeal motion. These results are compatible with literature but need further confirmation using studies performed with trained logopedists.


Price : 12.00 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE